00:16
<JonathanNeal>
eddieolson joined, eddieolson left, joined, left. He's as predictable as the spec.
00:16
<zewt>
gar is there some magic when i want to enter an address bar in firefox that happens to be open somewhere else
00:16
<dgorbik_>
Hixie: should all webvtt nodes be lineBoxes?
00:17
<zewt>
it demands very insistently that i switch to the other tab and refuses to autocomplete the url normally
00:17
<Hixie>
dgorbik_: what is a lineBox?
00:17
<dgorbik_>
Hixie: is display: block valid for any webvtt nodes in other words?
00:17
<dgorbik_>
Hixie: as far as I understand that's not valid at all
00:18
<Hixie>
what do you mean by "valid"?
00:18
<TabAtkins>
dgorbik_: "line boxes" isn't the right level of abstraction here. Maybe they're inline elements, but that's something different.
00:18
<dgorbik_>
Hixie: possible to have according to spevs
00:18
<TabAtkins>
(Line boxes get created out of all the inline elements participating in a given inline formatting context.)
00:18
<Hixie>
'display' doesn't apply to the ::cue() pseudo-element regardless of argument, if that's what you mean
00:19
<dgorbik_>
TabAtkins: right. I am still trying to understand something about ruby
00:19
<dgorbik_>
TabAtkins: and display: ruby
00:19
<TabAtkins>
dgorbik_: Don't try to understand display:ruby. It's a bad spec that we will rewrite.
00:20
<dgorbik_>
TabAtkins: so I guess it's probably fine to drop the support for styling ruby/rt in webvtt for now?
00:20
<dgorbik_>
elements will still exist but without any default styles...
00:21
<TabAtkins>
You should still format them as ruby, but dont' worry about their interation with the current CSS Ruby spec.
00:22
<dgorbik_>
TabAtkins: what do you mean by "format"?
00:22
<TabAtkins>
As in, shrink the rt and stack it on top of the rb. Normaly ruby formatting.
00:30
<kbrosnan>
zewt: shift overrides the tab switch behavior
02:10
<zewt>
in a thoroughly buggy way, it seems
06:39
<MikeSmith>
if I read https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782211 right, Gecko will soon have a fully conforming implementation of the current Notifications spec
06:51
<cgcardona>
MikeSmith: ah, that's the problem. You need to read it left </lamejoke>
06:52
<MikeSmith>
heh
06:52
<cgcardona>
:-]
11:02
<hellyeah>
i try to do clock wih svg http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/animate.html is it a good link tu study for it
11:02
<jgraham>
(this channel is typically for work on the specifications themselves. But I'm sure people will try to answer other questions too)
11:03
<hellyeah>
this is the first time i join this channel
11:03
<MikeSmith>
the #html5 channel might be better
11:03
<hellyeah>
i mean my question is kinda off topic sorry for that
11:03
<MikeSmith>
hellyeah: you might want to start by reading an SVG tutorial instead of the SVG spec
11:03
<hellyeah>
hmm
11:04
<hellyeah>
can you suggest svg tutorial to me if you have time
11:04
<MikeSmith>
http://html5demos.com/svg-clock
11:05
<MikeSmith>
http://www.nimblecoder.com/blog/archive/2009/12/30/animated-clocks-for-svg-and-silverlight.aspx
11:05
<MikeSmith>
could just do "view source" on some of those to start
11:08
<hellyeah>
it can be totally stupid question. But i should know ig it is not. Html5 is windows thing?
11:13
<jgraham>
Oooh, it's zcorpan
11:13
<zcorpan>
hey
11:15
<MikeSmith>
long time not see
11:18
<zcorpan>
indeed
11:18
<zcorpan>
i'll be offline for another while. just popped in here now accidentally. :-P
11:19
<jgraham>
Heh
11:20
<zcorpan>
so how's things?
11:21
<jgraham>
Pretty quiet
11:23
<jgraham>
Sounds like someone at moz. is implementing <track>
11:23
<jgraham>
It's nto clear if they have the right idea about how to read a spec or not :|
11:24
<jgraham>
But I pointed them at your tests at least
11:24
<Ms2ger>
It's a group of students
11:24
<zcorpan>
nice
11:24
<jgraham>
I see
11:24
<zcorpan>
bring on the clue bat :-)
11:24
<Ms2ger>
Lead by David Humphrey at Seneca
11:24
<Ms2ger>
I will :)
11:25
<jgraham>
Yeah, I remember them doing things before. Pointer lock last year, perhaps?
11:25
<MikeSmith>
yeah I think his students have a done several things that ended up landing
11:26
<Ms2ger>
Yep
11:26
<jgraham>
Seems liek a pretty neat course
11:27
<MikeSmith>
yeah if you read his blog postings, seems like he's got a great approach
11:28
<jgraham>
I haven't seen any about this time; perhaps he fell foul of the weird planet mozilla policies
11:28
<MikeSmith>
though comments from the guy that was here earlier asking implementing track parsing does make you think maybe they need some better direction in how to read a spec and how to implement from a spec
11:29
<MikeSmith>
in other news I'm going to make a serious effort this weekend to get github->w3c-test.org sync set up
11:29
<MikeSmith>
sorry it's taking so long
11:30
<Ms2ger>
Specs are hard, let's go shopping
11:30
<jgraham>
MikeSmith: Cool
13:08
<Jonny_>
hello everybody.
13:11
<Jonny_>
iam getting bad respone if using canvas EventListener. i´m using this in a phonegab application so base is webkit...
13:12
<Jonny_>
Are threre any other choice than EventListener detecting a touch area?
13:14
<Jonny_>
or frameworks to get smoother respone....?
16:31
<dglazkov>
good morning, Whatwg!
17:00
Ms2ger
snorts
17:02
<Velmont>
cocaine?
17:03
<Ms2ger>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2013JanMar/0120.html
17:06
<MikeSmith>
Ms2ger: he plays a mean bass
22:21
<zewt>
ios 6 safari ignores maxlength for <input type=number> but doesn't support max? :|
23:12
<smaug____>
gavin: ping
23:20
<gavin>
smaug____: pong
23:21
<smaug____>
gavin: nm. I think I can access bugzilla after all. Need to get the connection limit to moznet increased. This hotel is full of geeks
23:23
<smaug____>
gavin: but if you could hint to the right people that fixing Bug 837310 asap would be really nice
23:25
<gavin>
I can ping some people
23:26
<gavin>
though looks like dumitru's already on it
23:31
<smaug____>
ok, thanks