00:23
<lukeshu>
pbot: tell ovruni: Is it ok if I package openrc 0.23?
00:23
<botie>
will do
00:24
<lukeshu>
Whoops, wrong channel, sorry.
00:47
<MikeSmith>
lukeshu: hah, funny that you got another bot to respond though
00:47
<lukeshu>
indeed :)
02:54
<guest271314>
Hi. New here.
02:56
<guest271314>
Interested in implementation of passing ReadableStream to Request.body at fetch and fetch upload progress.
02:57
<guest271314>
Not sure how can help, though am willing to.
04:36
<MikeSmith>
guest271314: this is pretty much the quietest time of day here, so you probably want to hang around for a while yet
04:37
<guest271314>
@MikeSmith Ok
05:20
<Teletek>
yo
05:21
Teletek
is wondering
06:08
<guest271314>
Good day
09:27
<Ms2ger>
<a href="javascript:window.open('http://bing.com')">This changes the page</a>
11:42
<annevk>
MikeSmith: seems it no longer runs the tests now https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4104#issuecomment-269761621
11:43
<MikeSmith>
annevk: oh
11:43
<MikeSmith>
you pushed changes to the tests?
11:43
<MikeSmith>
rebased?
11:43
MikeSmith
looks
11:43
<MikeSmith>
nothing I changed would have affected the running of the tests
11:44
MikeSmith
looks through travis log
11:45
<MikeSmith>
weird
11:45
<annevk>
MikeSmith: just pushed
11:46
<annevk>
MikeSmith: changes that is
11:46
<MikeSmith>
dunno why it didn’t run the test
11:48
<MikeSmith>
looking at the logs I see the stability checker does recognize that the setters_tests.json and urltestdata.json files changed, but then it doesn’t identify the affected tests
11:49
<MikeSmith>
so, maybe some bug there
11:49
<MikeSmith>
will investigate
11:49
<MikeSmith>
in the mean time I think if you rebase and push again it will work
13:40
<annevk>
MikeSmith: okay, thanks, I don't really need it to work for these PRs, was mostly curious
13:40
<annevk>
MikeSmith: btw, are there plans to make Safari and Edge work too?
13:42
<MikeSmith>
annevk: yes, jgraham is on it already
13:42
<MikeSmith>
Simple Matter of Jgraham Time
13:43
<annevk>
best time
13:43
<MikeSmith>
heh
14:21
<jgraham>
Edge requires Microsoft to release it on some windows variant you can use with a CI system (i.e. not Windows 10 for licensing reasons)
14:21
<jgraham>
Safari is just a matter of time
14:26
<jgraham>
(there was something on Twitter about Microsoft having Plans here, but being twitter it's impossible to find now)
15:09
<gsnedders>
jgraham: oh, some talk with people made me conclude we could use BrowserStack, given we already just run Edge in wptrunner using RemoteWebDriver
15:09
<gsnedders>
jgraham: and that works for Edge and Safari
20:15
<jgraham>
gsnedders: I am pretty spectacurarly unexcited about connecting to a remote service running the browser vs having it on the same machine with full control over the browser process
20:16
<gsnedders>
jgraham: OTOH, the changes of getting a Windows or OS X box any time soon to do this seems… low.
20:17
<jgraham>
Travis has OSX boxes
20:17
<jgraham>
Not sure which OSX they have
20:17
<jgraham>
(are we supposed to call it macOS these days)
20:18
<gsnedders>
(probably)
20:18
<jgraham>
I would be way more inclined to care about fixing the problem for Edge if it wasn't an artifical issue purely of Microsoft's own making
20:18
<gsnedders>
you can get 10.12 for the latest Xcode at least
20:18
<gsnedders>
the alternative solution for the MS problem is to ask MS to provide some hardware and licenses to avoid the problem
20:20
<jgraham>
I would be happy with that solution too
20:21
<jgraham>
Honestly a single box would probably be enough. But being able to provision it with an in-tree config like we do with AppVeyor and Travis would be a big advantage
20:22
<gsnedders>
aye