| 06:10 | <annevk> | GPHemsley: graag gedaan |
| 07:47 | <annevk> | So my theory with all the weird IDNA problems we're seeing is that implementers have some checks reversed |
| 07:47 | <annevk> | They only do full ToASCII if there are no ASCII code points |
| 07:48 | <annevk> | Otherwise they don't care and just pass it along without much validation |
| 07:48 | <annevk> | Whereas UTS 46 does apply a bunch of processing even to plain ASCII input |
| 07:48 | <annevk> | I guess I should write some more tests and then raise this somehow |
| 09:26 | <annevk> | (If whatwg.org goes down, please ping me.) |
| 14:49 | <kiwi_12705> | DOM says "Event listeners key off the event’s `type` attribute value" |
| 14:49 | <kiwi_12705> | What does it mean? |
| 15:40 | <annevk> | Hmm, maybe we should indicate on the IRC page that it can take a while before you get a reply |
| 16:01 | <annevk> | (done) |
| 16:28 | <annevk> | JakeA: can you figure out why https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=365070 never went anywhere? |
| 16:28 | <annevk> | JakeA: is it something Chrome just doesn't want to do, or did the bug never got the attention from the right people? |
| 16:29 | <annevk> | (I emailed someone at Mozilla to get an equivalent answer for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=998590.) |
| 16:30 | <JakeA> | annevk: I haven't figured that it yet. Trying to work out if it breaks existing sites. |
| 16:30 | <JakeA> | that out* |
| 16:31 | <annevk> | JakeA: not all existing sites use <h1-6> correctly either, so I doubt the outline is always useful |
| 16:32 | <JakeA> | annevk: yeah, it comes down to "does it make things significantly worse vs better" |
| 16:32 | <JakeA> | Not sure how to test that other than manually |
| 16:32 | <annevk> | JakeA: it's still interesting though why it was never picked up to begin with |
| 16:33 | <annevk> | JakeA: since at some point in the past <section> wasn't a thing and wouldn't really be able to impact sites significantly |
| 16:33 | <annevk> | JakeA: maybe there's some hidden opposition to the feature? |
| 16:33 | <JakeA> | annevk: it might slow things down, but we could have restricted the cost to AT users |
| 16:33 | <annevk> | I guess keeping it all work dynamically adds some cost |
| 16:34 | <JakeA> | annevk: I'm guess it was just low priority because it's a11y + new |
| 16:34 | <annevk> | But it can't be that much |
| 16:34 | <JakeA> | Agreed |
| 17:19 | <boogyman> | JakeA: where should I report a media playback issue for Chrome Canary? |
| 17:40 | <JakeA> | boogyman: crbug.com |
| 17:44 | <boogyman> | oh, duh. cheers |