| 08:23 | <annevk> | TimothyGu: gave you access to whatwg/html, should be an invite somewhere |
| 09:09 | <zcorpan> | https://github.com/whatwg/whatwg.org/issues/59 seems like something where we should ask for help from the community, if someone's willing to do a redesign |
| 09:27 | <annevk> | zcorpan: maybe time to email whatwg⊙wo again? |
| 09:29 | <zcorpan> | annevk: yeah, but maybe wait a few days, see if we get response from the tweet |
| 11:25 | <JakeA> | tobie: are there docs for your spec CI stuff? As in, the preview & diff links |
| 11:39 | <JakeA> | tobie: no worries, I've found it |
| 12:33 | <tobie> | JakeA: LMK if you have issues setting it up. It should just work out of the box. |
| 12:56 | <zcorpan> | TabAtkins: ping https://github.com/tabatkins/bikeshed/issues/964 :-) |
| 12:56 | <botie> | will do |
| 13:17 | <JakeA> | tobie: any way to get it to apply to existing PRs? |
| 13:18 | <tobie> | JakeA: I should *automate* that upon first setup. |
| 13:19 | <tobie> | JakeA: in the meantime, just editing the post ever slightly should be enough (e.g. extra line break) |
| 13:19 | <JakeA> | tobie: ta! |
| 13:19 | <tobie> | JakeA: LMK if it works |
| 13:21 | <JakeA> | tobie: It worked! |
| 13:21 | <tobie> | cool |
| 14:01 | <gsnedders> | addEventListener("foo", () => aEL("foo", () => undefined)) won't invoke both foo, but only the outter one, right? because it constructs a list of event listeners before it starts invoking any, right? |
| 14:11 | <annevk> | gsnedders: yeah, only remove is immediate |
| 15:46 | <wanderview> | I know people think wrapping lines shouldn't matter any more... but github PR's requiring horizontal scrolling are a lot harder to review |
| 15:48 | <tobie> | wanderview: use split view |
| 15:48 | <wanderview> | tobie: thanks, that does help |
| 15:53 | <wanderview> | I guess JakeA is reviewing it so I don't have to read the diff anyway |
| 15:54 | <JakeA> | wanderview: I use split view too. But did you see the preview/diff links in the top post? |
| 15:55 | <wanderview> | JakeA: no... and those are quite nice |
| 18:50 | <wanderview> | Domenic: JakeA: What spec does AbortController live in? |
| 18:50 | <wanderview> | I guess DOM |
| 18:53 | <wanderview> | JakeA: do we expect FetchObserver to be a thing or has it been axed? |
| 18:54 | <JakeA> | wanderview: yeah it's the DOM spec |
| 18:54 | <JakeA> | wanderview: I'm still interested in fetch observer |
| 18:54 | <wanderview> | ok, so it just hasn't landed in the spec yet? |
| 18:55 | <JakeA> | I want to get other stuff landed first, like abort & range requests |
| 18:55 | <wanderview> | k |
| 18:55 | <JakeA> | wanderview: yeah it's still just a sketch |
| 19:04 | <wanderview> | JakeA: is this the latest spec proposal for AbortSignal in fetch? https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/branch-snapshots/cancelation/#requestinit |
| 19:05 | <wanderview> | JakeA: baku has a patch that makes RequestInit.signal `AbortSignal?` instead of `AbortSignal`... trying to determine if thats correct |
| 19:22 | <wanderview> | JakeA: can a Request have a null signal? |
| 19:23 | <wanderview> | oh, it says initial a new AbortSignal |
| 19:50 | <wanderview> | JakeA: I think we should probably add a WPT test that does a fetch() which is intercepted by a SW, then outer fetch() aborts and tests that the SW sees the abort on its signal |
| 22:25 | <JakeA> | wanderview: yeah, that makes sense |