01:43
<gsnedders>
nox: woah dude, turn down the sarcasm, not sure I can cope
07:20
<MikeSmith>
came across http://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7231.html the other day
07:21
<MikeSmith>
and I see there’s also http://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7230.html and more
07:21
<MikeSmith>
the HTTP specs in actual readable HTML
07:24
<MikeSmith>
readable on mobile even
07:41
<MikeSmith>
“Bootstrap-ised HTML” generated from the XML sources using XSLT
07:41
<MikeSmith>
https://github.com/httpwg/httpwg.github.io/blob/master/specs/lib/rfcbootstrap.xslt
08:56
<annevk>
No HTTPS? But also, all these different URLs for RFCs do nobody any good
09:01
<MikeSmith>
yeah they should just use real HTML at the https://tools.ietf.org/ URLs
09:01
<MikeSmith>
and yeah no HTTPS, I guess because they are hosting from github
13:44
<Domenic>
Those are nice and readable though
13:58
<annevk>
The problem is that you don't know they're accurate (unless you happen to be in the know)
13:59
<annevk>
There's RFCs scattered all over the place and unless you know somehow you can trust the publishers directing folks there seems bad
14:55
<Iarfen>
hi!
16:48
<annevk>
hi Iarfen
22:59
<TabAtkins>
How am I actually supposed to start up the wpt server locally? The directions in the docs are out-of-date - they tell me to run a `serve` script, but there isn't one (there's a `serve.py` script, so I assume it got switched from bash to Python at some point).
23:06
<zcorpan>
TabAtkins: ./wpt serve
23:06
<TabAtkins>
plz update docs
23:08
<zcorpan>
TabAtkins: where are you reading?
23:08
<TabAtkins>
The intro docs
23:08
<TabAtkins>
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/8144
23:09
<TabAtkins>
someone reported this a few days ago already
23:15
<zcorpan>
I need to sleep, but can follow up tomorrow
23:17
<jgraham>
TabAtkins: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/8183
23:17
<jgraham>
PRs are also appreciated
23:18
<jgraham>
Also, I don't think it's your problem, but Python 2.7.6 is super old and has known security bugs
23:18
<jgraham>
2.7.14 is the latest
23:20
<TabAtkins>
jgraham: PR looks good to me