| 08:23 | <MikeSmith> | 2 |
| 11:28 | <nox> | Oh nice, |
| 11:28 | <nox> | whoever cleaned the IDL stuff: thank you, |
| 11:29 | <nox> | this removed all the indices in the test names. |
| 11:31 | <nox> | Still have a few IDL harness failures though. :( |
| 11:52 | <nox> | https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/10356 https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/10357 |
| 13:00 | <benjamingr_> | Whoever worked on byob readers for readers in streams - thanks - and good job :) |
| 13:01 | <benjamingr_> | really useful |
| 16:38 | <Domenic> | \o/ |
| 16:38 | <Domenic> | That was largely tyoshino :) |
| 16:45 | <smaug____> | hmm, is whatwg.org a bit slow today |
| 16:53 | <Domenic> | Instant on my machine |
| 17:17 | <domfarolino> | Likewise |
| 20:41 | <lgrahl> | o/ |
| 20:41 | <lgrahl> | Can someone point me to what WebIDL does when I pass in an invalid value? For example, I have a function with the following signature: `foo(unsigned short blah)`. What is supposed to happen if I call `foo(65536)`? |
| 21:06 | <TabAtkins> | lgrahl: https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-unsigned-short |
| 21:06 | <TabAtkins> | That whole top-level section is hwat you need. |
| 21:07 | <lgrahl> | TabAtkins: Thanks. Found it in the meantime and am losing my hair very fast now. :) |