| 07:55 | <annevk> | mkwst: sec-metadata seems reasonable, but I wouldn't start out with all members from the get go |
| 07:55 | <annevk> | mkwst: well, that'll just delay it until we figured out the final shape of initiator I guess |
| 07:56 | <mkwst> | Initiator is interesting because it allows us to distinguish downloads. I don't remember any of the other initiators being interesting. |
| 07:56 | <mkwst> | But, I'm running to a meeting. Back in 30. |
| 07:56 | <annevk> | mkwst: it also seems a little weird to share initiator and destination with the server; as ideally they don't conneg on that |
| 07:57 | <annevk> | Downloads still needs to be sorted interoperability-wise |
| 07:57 | <nox> | gsnedders, Domenic: Oh yeah, not planning to change that `for (let foo in …)` test in WPT for Servo, just want a pat in the back and be told "it will be ok". :P |
| 07:58 | <nox> | ajeffrey_ got some good progress on the SM update front though, props to him. |
| 12:37 | <smaug____> | annevk: do you happen to know if https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-clear-site-data/ has got any proper review? |
| 12:41 | <mkwst> | smaug____: Dubious review at best. The guy who wrote it has weird ideas, and Chrome's the only implementing browser. I expect bugs to fall out when more folks are paying attention. |
| 12:43 | <ajeffrey_> | nox: thanks. Still blocked on [expletive deleted] Windows build, this time link errors in debugmozjs, sigh. |
| 12:43 | <ajeffrey_> | Oh well, different errors from last week, so that's progress. |
| 12:44 | <smaug____> | mkwst: hehe. Ok, not reviewed. |
| 12:45 | <mkwst> | Patches welcome! |
| 12:51 | <annevk> | smaug____: I reviewed it a bit, but there's a lot of work outstanding |
| 12:51 | <annevk> | smaug____: in particular with cleaning up how this integrates with all the various established things |
| 12:51 | <annevk> | smaug____: I think it had TAG review too |
| 13:03 | <smaug____> | mkwst: I assume Chrome isn't shipping it yet |
| 13:07 | <annevk> | smaug____: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/rXxzsXLuZEc/HM17-B75BQAJ suspect they are |
| 13:18 | <mkwst> | Since Chrome 61 (Augustish?). Google Photos is the only site I know of using it at scale, so we still have opportunity to shift things around a bit. |
| 19:10 | wanderview | reads about portals... |
| 19:16 | <nox> | wanderview: Are you thinking with portals yet? |
| 19:16 | <wanderview> | I don't think so... |