04:31
<wfpkhc>
hello
04:32
<wfpkhc>
bye i will tlak later
08:24
<hsivonen>
annevk: should I expect to have to cherrypick a new version of WPT's IDL parser in order to have your addition of window.event to the IDL tests work?
08:24
<hsivonen>
just putting the IDL change in m-c breaks all WPT IDL tests
08:24
<SimonSapin>
are HTTP(S) documents allowed to fetch anything at all from file: URLs? Where would that be specified?
08:30
<hsivonen>
I see WebIDL tests including a script called /resources/WebIDLParser.js, but I don't see a file of that name in the WPT repo
08:30
<hsivonen>
where does it come from?
08:31
<hsivonen>
looks like wpt serve magically serves it
08:34
<hsivonen>
lots of changes between m-c and the wpt repo for /resources/idlharness.js :-(
08:48
<Ms2ger>
hsivonen, yeah, m-c is more than a month out of date
08:48
<Ms2ger>
hsivonen, but jgraham is back from vacation today
08:49
<Ms2ger>
hsivonen, /resources/WebIDLParser.js is in https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/resources/webidl2/lib/webidl2.js for historical reasons
09:01
<hsivonen>
Ms2ger: thanks
09:41
<hsivonen>
now attachShadow is not a function. Is that part of an old shadow DOM spec and got removed or is that part of the latest spec but isn't turned on by default in Gecko?
09:43
<annevk>
The latter
09:43
<hsivonen>
weird. dom.webcomponents.shadowdom.enabled shows up as *modified* to false
13:16
<mkwst>
SimonSapin: Chrome blocks `file:` from `http:`/`https:`. It falls into the exception sketched out in the `file:` bits of https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#scheme-fetch, that throws its hands in the air and says "Do whatever. Ugh." :)
14:22
<SimonSapin>
thanks mkwst
14:22
<Domenic>
Another unhelpful piece of the puzzle is at https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#origin
14:23
<SimonSapin>
(the context of this question is https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2757#issuecomment-401656627)
16:16
<jugglinmike>
TabAtkins: Do you have a minute to talk about Bikeshed?
17:28
<gsnedders|ooo>
jugglinmike: he's in Sydney now, AFAIK
17:28
<jugglinmike>
ah, got it
17:28
<jugglinmike>
thanks for the heads up
17:32
<Domenic>
Does anyone know if Edge has a bfcache?
18:07
<wanderview>
Domenic: it seems to reload based on casual inspection, but I could be wrong
18:07
<wanderview>
or using devtools could disable it or something
22:59
<rniwa>
Domenic: yt?