| 01:05 | <devsnek> | Domenic: whats up with <td> elements not being closed |
| 01:05 | <Domenic> | devsnek: why would you close them :) |
| 01:05 | <devsnek> | i can't tell if you're kidding or not |
| 01:08 | <devsnek> | Domenic: do you see in there what would be causing the remote thing to be 400ing again https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/QIlVxE8r/thing.diff |
| 01:11 | <Domenic> | Hmm I'm disappointed we don't have better errors. Let's see. |
| 01:12 | <devsnek> | i'm installing bikeshed now so hopefully i can get better errors |
| 01:12 | <Domenic> | devsnek: method name with . in it |
| 01:13 | <devsnek> | oh that should just be next() |
| 01:13 | <Domenic> | Ya like the other classes |
| 01:13 | <devsnek> | what a wild world |
| 01:16 | <Domenic> | That's another detail to figure out, class vs. just a prototype, hrm. |
| 01:19 | <Domenic> | Ohhh the bad errors are because annevk's fix was only for make deploy, not make remote |
| 01:20 | <devsnek> | Domenic: i don't think there's any need for a full class |
| 01:20 | <devsnek> | most other places in the spec don't use a full class either |
| 02:42 | <Domenic> | devsnek: well in streams they do, IIRC. ES is special in that it does this only-a-prototype thing |
| 02:43 | <TimothyGu> | FWIW sync iterator objects in Web IDL are also prototype-only |
| 02:44 | <Domenic> | Hmm fair |
| 04:09 | <annevk> | Domenic: hmm that wasm stuff sounds wrong depending on the details; Iโve said a few times in issues what I think the way forward isโฆ |
| 04:33 | <annevk> | Domenic: oh yeah so coupling origin to these objects is not something we should do |
| 06:25 | <annevk> | Woohoo, no more multiple globals per document, thanks TimothyGu! |
| 06:26 | <annevk> | Does anyone else have "frankwabe" show up in GitHub notifications as if they participate in an issue, but actually they're not a GitHub user? |
| 06:26 | <annevk> | I guess they were a spammer and GitHub forgets to remove all traces? |
| 06:28 | annevk | reports it to GitHub |
| 06:36 | <rniwa> | annevk: i hope someone is writing lots of tests |
| 06:45 | <annevk> | rniwa: yeah, I wrote a bunch some time ago and TimothyGu is adding loads more now; should all be linked from the various issues |
| 06:45 | <rniwa> | annevk: yeah, I just saw that. very nice! |
| 06:46 | <rniwa> | annevk: this simplification should eliminate a whole bunch of spec concepts around the global object & document mapping |
| 06:46 | <rniwa> | annevk: for the longest time, i wondered why those things are needed LOL |
| 06:46 | <annevk> | ๐ |
| 06:47 | <rniwa> | hm... Olli is not here yet? |
| 06:48 | <annevk> | I'd expect smaug____ to be asleep, but you never know |
| 06:48 | <rniwa> | annevk: it's 9:48am in Helsinki, right? |
| 06:48 | <annevk> | He doesn't have the average European schedule |
| 06:48 | <rniwa> | to be fair, i'd never be awake that early |
| 06:48 | <annevk> | heh, he's similar |
| 07:01 | <rniwa> | annevk: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/208 is an interesting issue |
| 07:02 | <rniwa> | annevk: I *think* I understand what Olli is getting at. |
| 07:18 | <rniwa> | annevk: fwiw, I think the change you're proposing to expose window.event in the case of the event being composed makes sense to me: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/679 |
| 07:18 | rniwa | is about to fix shadow DOM related bugs |
| 08:20 | <smaug____> | now it is roughly right time to wake up |
| 08:22 | <Ms2ger> | You're up early |
| 09:11 | <zcorpan_> | annevk: I think I'll turn the draft proposal to a PR today |
| 09:12 | <zcorpan_> | mstensho will work on implementing in chromium |
| 09:12 | <annevk> | \o/ |
| 09:13 | <zcorpan_> | everyone supports -webkit-appearance, nobody supports appearance. good times |
| 09:14 | <annevk> | zcorpan_: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/Fq6OH5SWeRo/lxHDXFnwCQAJ is prolly of interest |
| 09:15 | <zcorpan_> | I guess I'll put -webkit-appearance in the UA stylesheet |
| 09:17 | <zcorpan_> | annevk: thx. I've filed https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3024 |
| 12:12 | <annevk> | Domenic: so it doesn't seem like anything happened with CSP and Wasm since I last looked; any particular reason why you pinged me? |
| 12:12 | <annevk> | Domenic: is Wasm shipping already? |
| 12:13 | <annevk> | Hmm it is |
| 12:13 | <annevk> | Seems bad that CSP isn't sorted then |
| 12:18 | <Ms2ger> | >Enable Shadow DOM in release builds: RESOLVED FIXED in Firefox 63 |
| 12:18 | <Ms2ger> | Hear hear |
| 12:53 | <Domenic> | annevk: I got an email from Ben Titzer that the Wasm CG wants to figure out their CSP story now. |
| 12:54 | <annevk> | Domenic: it'd help if they respond to my issues ๐ |
| 12:54 | <annevk> | I think I've pretty much laid out how it should work, but if they need more detail that can be provided of course |
| 15:02 | <Domenic> | annevk: to be clear, by "I'd be happy to land this refactoring as I think it's mostly a net positive" you mean including the normative changes? |
| 15:04 | <annevk> | Domenic: yes |
| 15:04 | <Domenic> | Great :) |
| 15:05 | <Domenic> | Although I'm thinking maybe we should rip out the type-with-no-src option, hmm |
| 15:05 | <annevk> | Domenic: that's no longer implemented? |
| 15:05 | <Domenic> | I can't imagine any MIME type for which it would be |
| 15:05 | <Domenic> | Otherwise we have to add a fallback clause for if it's not handled by any plugin I think |
| 15:06 | <annevk> | Might be worth asking qdot first, seems pretty responsive |
| 15:06 | <annevk> | Gotta go for a bit |
| 15:08 | <Domenic> | I guess maybe just refactoring to make it less duplicative makes that seem less bad |
| 15:10 | <Domenic> | I guess it seems kind of implemented |
| 15:11 | <Domenic> | Like http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?saved=6120 is different than http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?saved=6121 in Chrome |