01:55
<innovati>
<3 what a fun example
02:10
<domfarolino>
annevk: Do you know of a bug on bugzilla for the <script type=module> credentials change?
04:34
<annevk>
domfarolino: nothing linked from the issue/PR/tests PR? Anyway, not offhand
04:34
<domfarolino>
I don’t think there was anything linked from there. I’ll file
05:00
<annevk>
Perhaps from the Fetch PR if we made that cover all somehow
07:47
<domfarolino>
Ah. I’ll check
09:25
<sjamaan>
Where does bikeshed get its references from? I added [[!STD68]] and it "just worked"
09:38
<sjamaan>
ah, found biblio-st.data
12:31
<sjamaan>
I have a question about the Participation Agreement. The "signing as an individual" says "I represent that I do not work in the field of web technologies as an employee, contractor, or agent of another person or legal entity, and make this Agreement in my personal capacity only."
12:31
<sjamaan>
What exactly does this mean?
15:30
<devsnek>
is there anything i should do to mark the async iterator test as needing Symbol.asyncIterator
15:37
<devsnek>
do i have to make an html file for this?
16:46
<Domenic>
devsnek: no need to mark, and you need to run the html file wrapper generator script
16:46
<devsnek>
so html files are required?
16:46
<devsnek>
what happened to putting things that only need js in js files :(
16:47
<Domenic>
devsnek: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/10597
16:48
<devsnek>
so the runner just needs to be updated?
16:49
<Domenic>
And probably some of the boilerplate in each test needs fixing, and all the test files need renaming
16:49
<Domenic>
domenic/wpt-runner being updated is only necessary if you want to run the tests without a browser
16:49
<devsnek>
i guess i'll just do .html for now
16:50
<Domenic>
yeah probably best to avoid shaving that yak
16:51
<devsnek>
much sad
17:33
<TabAtkins>
sjamaan: Ultimately it gets its reference data from SpecRef.org
17:35
<TabAtkins>
sjamaan: If you work for a browser or other "web technologies" company, then you're in the domain of W3C membership, and can only "participate" as a W3C member (unless you get an exception to be an Invited Expert or the like).
17:43
<sjamaan>
TabAtkins: I work for a company that creates web applications, I suppose that doesn't fall under this clause?
17:43
<TabAtkins>
I have no idea!
17:43
<sjamaan>
The wording isn't exactly crystal clear
17:44
<TabAtkins>
Having always worked either as an IE or for a W3C-member company, I don't actually know the boundaries of this. ;_;
17:44
<sjamaan>
I'd appreciate if someone could clarify
21:32
<JKingWeb>
I'm a bit confused about the EUC-JP decoder. According to the Encoding specification, byte 5C should decode to a reverse solidus, and this is what Firefox and Vivaldi both do. The test suite, on the other hand, affirms that it should decode to a yen sign like happens with Shift_JIS---and yet both Firefox and Vivaldi claim to pass the test.
21:32
<JKingWeb>
And to pile on more uncertainty, per the specification the encoder is supposed to encode a yen sign into the single byte 5C. I'm at a loss.