02:46
<Domenic>
foolip: wiki cert expiration fired; not sure auto-renew is working right. https://travis-ci.org/whatwg/misc-server/builds/506086299
02:55
<MikeSmith>
Domenic: I will also look into it myself right now
02:55
<Domenic>
Thank you!!
03:07
<MikeSmith>
hmm, “You have an existing certificate that has exactly the same domains or certificate name you requested and isn't close to expiry” ..
03:08
<MikeSmith>
expiry on all the certs is June 3, 2019
03:10
<MikeSmith>
so now I am confused why those “certificate expiry date” errors in our Travis are saying
03:15
<MikeSmith>
coming from https://github.com/whatwg/misc-server/blob/master/test/certs.js#L73
03:15
<MikeSmith>
but that doesn’t actually seem to be throwing..
03:26
<MikeSmith>
ah I see, it’s just wiki.whatwg.org that it’s reporting
03:27
<MikeSmith>
> 1) certificate expiry date wiki.whatwg.org:Error: cert expires in less than 25 days: Apr 7 23:05:46 2019 GMT
04:07
<MikeSmith>
Domenic: https://travis-ci.org/whatwg/misc-server/builds/506086299 all green now
04:08
<MikeSmith>
I manually ran cerbot renew on the wiki.whatwg.org host. I couldn’t figure out if we have automation set up for renewing that one. Looking into that will need foolip I reckon
13:29
<Ms2ger>
Domenic, ping https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/684
13:30
<Ms2ger>
annevk, ping https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/666
14:46
<annevk>
ugh Domenic
14:46
<annevk>
browsers are not consistent between srcdoc and non-srcdoc
14:46
<annevk>
so much to test
14:46
<annevk>
How did all these features land to begin with?
16:42
<annevk>
Domenic: thanks for adding those comments to standards-positions \o/
16:42
<Domenic>
:)
16:55
<nox>
que
16:55
<nox>
Utter focus fail, disregard me.
17:24
<annevk>
nox: do you know why https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/15844 removed a test? No rationale in upstream PR
17:25
<nox>
annevk: No damn clue.
17:56
<annevk>
nox: interested in chasing that? That reminds me. Your stuff should really get some attention. I want that script queue thing in
17:57
annevk
sets a reminder to look at that again
17:59
<nox>
annevk: Domenic commented and Manish replied, on the Servo PR.
17:59
<annevk>
Ah
17:59
<nox>
annevk: I was too absorbed by some fancy Rust stuff I did last week and didn't come back to the spec stuff.
17:59
<nox>
Will try to do that next week.
17:59
<Domenic>
I guess I should have said anything, but I'm never sure when you European folk sleep
17:59
<Domenic>
s/anything/something/
18:00
<Domenic>
(So, I thought I'd just comment myself and save you the trouble.)
18:00
<nox>
Domenic: Don't worry, if you ping me and I don't want to reply, I'll just ignore the ping with all my French smugness.
18:00
<Domenic>
something something baguettes
18:01
<nox>
Domenic: That actually highlights me too. 😂
20:33
<annevk>
Domenic: if you have time it'd be nice if you could give a final look at https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/pull/118
20:33
<annevk>
Domenic: last round of nits was just addressed
20:34
<Domenic>
Sure
21:06
<Mek>
thanks for all the quick and thorough reviews
21:10
<Domenic>
Thank you for the heroic maintenance
21:21
<annevk>
Indeed, fishd will be happy
21:27
<Mek>
Domenic: any samples of specs that properly use internal slots for their interface attributes? I keep wanting to do so, but I'm never sure what the canonical way to define them is, so I just keep waiting for the webidl PR that makes it easier to land but that seems to keep stalling as well...
21:29
<Domenic>
Mek: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#interface-abortcontroller and the nearby AbortSignal are pretty solid.
21:30
<Mek>
Ah, yes. That's pretty straight forward. Thanks.