06:44
<hsivonen>
dbaron: thanks. I wanted to make sure the scrolling attribute on iframes didn't have a CSS mapping
07:18
<annevk>
hsivonen: it does not do more than overflow:none, no?
07:36
<hsivonen>
annevk: does overflow:none applied to the iframe element itself prevent it from scrolling?
07:43
<annevk>
hsivonen: I'd expect not
07:43
<annevk>
hsivonen: nope
07:43
<annevk>
data:text/html,<iframe style=overflow:none srcdoc="<br>t<br>g<br>t<br>t<br>t<br>g<br>t<br>t<br>t<br>g<br>t<br>t<br>t<br>g<br>t<br>t<br>t<br>g<br>t<br>t"></iframe>
07:52
<hsivonen>
good. thanks
15:30
<annevk>
domfarolino: you probably wanna read through https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3840#issuecomment-481034206
15:31
<domfarolino>
annevk: will do thank you
15:38
<smaug____>
annevk: so all the lazyload elements get auto per default, and wouldn't block page load by default
15:39
<smaug____>
so UA wouldn't need to block top level page load ever for iframes?
15:39
<smaug____>
I must be missing something
15:39
<annevk>
smaug____: oh sorry, after posting I realized the "auto" thing might be significant
15:39
<annevk>
smaug____: per the PR it doesn't interact with the load event at all
15:40
<annevk>
smaug____: that's the problem I was seeing
15:40
<smaug____>
ok
15:40
<smaug____>
yeah, that is major issue
17:53
<bkardell>
was doing some stuff with analyzing tag names and attributes and noticed that the single page html spec contains like 54k <c- elements with boolean single letter attributes... is there somewhere I can read about what that's about?
17:54
<bkardell>
just curious
18:09
<astearns>
TabAtkins: ^ I think I remember the <c- b> stuff was something you were doing, but I forget what it was about
18:15
<astearns>
ah, bkardell they're for highlighting
18:16
<bkardell>
yeah I am just curious if anyone wrote about that choice, it seems unusual if legal
18:16
<astearns>
https://freenode.logbot.info/whatwg/20180605#c1575174
18:19
<Mek>
https://github.com/tabatkins/highlighter/commit/75e91017fa33302a9a02876c8a2e4e8d138bf975
19:05
<bkardell>
yeah, I wondered if that was all there is to it :-p
21:23
<bkardell>
so... we have a lot of issues about custom attributes and a long history of mentions in webplatform about 'some kind of way to mixin behaviors' and 'kind of like custom elements' - but... do we actually have anything resembling a proposal or something that lays out use cases and enough details of boundaries that would help it avoid the sorts of problems that hosed is="" and decorators and xbl and .htc-like solutions?
21:23
<bkardell>
I spent some time searching and I can't find one
21:24
<bkardell>
s/one/something helpful about this