| 12:33 | <MikeSmith> | bkardell: about the highlighting markup, I don’t know what the savings would be when they’re gzipped. But anyway, browsers don’t load the gzipped version |
| 14:21 | <hsivonen> | annevk: TIL: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/uchardet/ and https://github.com/thuleqaid/rust-chardet/tree/master/src |
| 14:23 | <Ms2ger> | > available at http://lxr.mozilla.org |
| 14:23 | <Ms2ger> | Hah |
| 14:24 | <hsivonen> | Ms2ger: the code was removed from m-c, except for the Japanese remains, even before searchfox |
| 14:24 | <annevk> | hsivonen: I didn't read the name carefully and was hoping you'd found a new Encoding Standard impl |
| 14:24 | <Ms2ger> | "available" is a big word for lxr, though |
| 14:24 | <hsivonen> | annevk: no, just more ports of the old Mozilla "universal" chardet |
| 17:00 | <eeeps> | Is color-handling of images with no profile attached spec'd anywhere (I assume they must be interpreted as sRGB, but haven't been able to find that officially stated anywhere) |
| 17:01 | <eeeps> | ? |
| 17:21 | <annevk> | eeeps: I'm not sure, it ought to be |
| 17:22 | <annevk> | eeeps: it's somewhere between HTML and CSS and image formats, so maybe that's why it's not |
| 20:47 | <eeeps> | annevk: ok so there's this https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color/#sRGB. Authoritative enough or should I file an issue on HTML? |