| 00:57 | <MikeSmith> | Domenic: about https://freenode.logbot.info/whatwg/20190506#c2160727 |
| 00:57 | <MikeSmith> | > oliverdunk: Would someone be able to clarify what is meant by "the field of web technologies" in the contributor agreement? |
| 00:58 | <MikeSmith> | do you know if that person ended up submitting a PR or raising an issue? |
| 00:58 | <MikeSmith> | or did they just go away without us hearing anything more from them? |
| 01:01 | <MikeSmith> | OK, I find https://github.com/oliverdunk |
| 01:39 | <Domenic> | MikeSmith: yep, being discussed in the long thread |
| 01:48 | <MikeSmith> | OK |
| 01:49 | MikeSmith | needs to catch up on GitHub notifications |
| 01:55 | <MikeSmith> | https://jameshfisher.com/2019/04/27/the-inception-bar-a-new-phishing-method/ |
| 01:57 | <MikeSmith> | Firefox has the same problem |
| 01:58 | <MikeSmith> | is there even a “don’t ever hide the address bar” user option? |
| 15:34 | <Domenic> | annevk: ping on Infra reviews (for tomorrow) |
| 15:37 | <Ms2ger> | Domenic, for synthetic modules, do you think IDL would be a good spec to put them in? |
| 15:38 | <Domenic> | Ms2ger: yeah, I think for now at least, maybe with a "this may be upstreamed to 262 as part of the JS standard library proposal" note. And maybe eventually it may be the right place for it anyway, if we end up specifying that the JS spec's built-in modules also should use Web IDL. |
| 15:39 | <Ms2ger> | Ok, I'll see if I have time tomorrow |
| 15:40 | <Domenic> | Awesome, thank you! |
| 19:26 | <zcorpan_> | Domenic: can you review https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/16734 ? I don't think I have the right domain knowledge for this one |
| 19:27 | <Domenic> | zcorpan_: for sure, will do tomorrow |
| 19:27 | <zcorpan_> | thx |
| 20:41 | <annevk> | Have had a bit of a backlog for a while, but can prioritize those Infra PRs. They look interesting 😊 |
| 21:19 | <Domenic> | I've surveyed the landscape of focus stuff. Expect a brain dump on an initial plan tomorrow. |