| 07:24 | <TimothyGu> | anyone knows what "Hopefully Kam and Tess won't notice they're covered by these acknowledgments three times!" means in HTML's source comment |
| 07:31 | <annevk> | TimothyGu: I know it made sense when it was added |
| 07:31 | <TimothyGu> | lol probably |
| 07:32 | <annevk> | TimothyGu: I’d have to check if it still does |
| 07:35 | <annevk> | TimothyGu: given all the groups it prolly still does, but not sure |
| 07:54 | <TimothyGu> | time to update all tc39.github.io links to tc39.es? |
| 07:54 | <TimothyGu> | (former redirects to latter) |
| 08:32 | <gsnedders> | TimothyGu: Tess by name in the huge paragraph, the #whatwg crew, and by name in custom elements. Kam by name in the main ack section, #mrt(.no)?, dunno about the third for him. Tess is arguably covered a fourth time by "all the contributors to the various W3C HTML WG lists and…" |
| 08:32 | <gsnedders> | Or at least that's how I can justify that? |
| 08:32 | <gsnedders> | oh, Tess is also in the RICG list |
| 08:34 | <gsnedders> | tl;dr: all Tess, all the time |
| 08:34 | <gsnedders> | (Sorry hober) |
| 08:44 | <MikeSmith> | JakeA++ (for serving up a richness of ServiceWorker updates) |
| 08:46 | <JakeA> | MikeSmith: Cheers! Matt & I did a sprint on it this week. Although naturally a couple of "this will be a quick fix" things ate most of the time |
| 08:46 | <MikeSmith> | heh |
| 08:46 | <annevk> | TimothyGu: I guess we should update those links, yes |
| 14:27 | <annevk> | dtapuska: let me know if you're still waiting for me with https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4664 now Domenic gave feedback |
| 14:30 | <hober> | hahaha |
| 14:39 | <annevk> | gsnedders: hober: PRs accepted for making that a 4 😛 |
| 14:43 | <gsnedders> | annevk: but not 5? |
| 14:44 | <annevk> | gsnedders: oh sorry, should have kept rereading |
| 14:44 | <gsnedders> | :) |
| 14:44 | <gsnedders> | YOU CAN NEVER HAVE TOO MUCH hober |
| 14:45 | <annevk> | very true ❤️ |
| 15:05 | <hober> | dawwwwwwh |
| 15:05 | hober | blushes |
| 15:06 | <hober> | i'm pretty sure i have the lowest "magnitude of impact on the spec" / "number of acks" ratio ever |
| 15:09 | <TabAtkins> | Nah, you've done more than 5x the impact of at least *some* of the single-mention people. ^_^ |
| 16:00 | <Mek> | huh, https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-secure-contexts/#is-origin-trustworthy explicitly treats "file:" URLs as "potentially trustworthy", but only if the URL didn't actually have an opaque origin, while url "encourages" browsers to treat "file:" as opaque origins... |
| 18:04 | <TimothyGu> | gsnedders: ah Tess = hober. Sorry for being completely ignorant |
| 19:01 | <gsnedders> | TimothyGu: (Kam you probably won't know; friend of Hixie's from uni, also ex-Opera) |
| 19:18 | <annevk> | Very good at Ricochet Robots |
| 20:52 | <dtapuska> | annevk: I just gotta get time to get back to that PR maybe next week sometime |
| 21:23 | <Domenic> | Ricochet Robots is the worst |