| 00:10 | <TimothyGu> | MikeSmith: there's also https://github.com/Sebmaster/tr46.js, which extracts the data it needs from Unicode as a build step |
| 00:41 | <MikeSmith> | TimothyGu: Oh cool, thanks |
| 06:25 | <domfarolino> | annevk: WRT the fingerprint thingy...I think the LazyLoad feature could be used to track/report a given user's scroll location on a page...but do we also think it could be used to fingerprint a user? Only thing I can think of is that the loading behavior could be correlated to UAs that support the feature etc. |
| 06:51 | <annevk> | domfarolino: yeah, we should separate fingerprint/tracking I suppose |
| 07:01 | <domfarolino> | annevk: We as in "HTML Standard would ideally provide a way to distinguish these concerns", or "domfarolino should create two fingerprint thingys in the LazyLoad attribute section" |
| 07:11 | <annevk> | domfarolino: Maciej suggested somewhere to split it to cover tracking vectors too |
| 07:12 | <annevk> | domfarolino: I think we need to highlight those vectors and recommend mitigations (i.e., if script is disabled, disable this as well) |
| 07:15 | <annevk> | domfarolino: Iād not block this on Infra improvements, but we can add some of the wording and a TODO comment or some such |
| 07:31 | <domfarolino> | annevk: Sounds good, thank you |
| 19:21 | <rniwa> | smaug____: yt? |
| 19:22 | <smaug____> | rniwa: yup |
| 19:22 | <rniwa> | smaug____: would you be at TPAC this year? |
| 19:22 | <smaug____> | yes |
| 19:23 | <rniwa> | smaug____: if so, I was wondering if we should allocate web components discussion time as well? |
| 19:23 | <smaug____> | I think so |
| 19:23 | <smaug____> | annevk: ^ |
| 19:23 | <rniwa> | smaug____: unfortunately, apple hasn't joined newly chartered web apps WG yet as far as i know. |
| 19:23 | <rniwa> | smaug____: so it's kind of weird for me to ask for a time slot |
| 19:23 | <rniwa> | smaug____: I was wondering if you or someone else from Mozilla could ask for a room somewhere?? |
| 19:24 | <smaug____> | we could |
| 19:24 | <smaug____> | on Thursday or Friday? |
| 19:24 | <smaug____> | or both? |
| 19:24 | <smaug____> | depends on agenda I guess |
| 19:25 | <rniwa> | smaug____: I highly doubt we need two days given there hasn't been much progress made |
| 19:25 | <smaug____> | very true |
| 19:25 | <rniwa> | smaug____: also, we probably have much less web devs? |
| 19:25 | <smaug____> | oh, right, Marcos is a chair |
| 19:26 | <smaug____> | I'll ping him |
| 19:26 | <rniwa> | smaug____: I think I'm mostly interested in nailing down scoped custom element registry |
| 19:26 | <smaug____> | I'd like us to spend again some time on open issues |
| 19:26 | <rniwa> | smaug____: and delegatesFocus, which rakina@google has been working on to spec |
| 19:26 | <rniwa> | smaug____: right |
| 19:26 | <rniwa> | smaug____ : I think TPAC would be a great place for that since all relevant WG people are there |
| 19:27 | <rniwa> | smaug____: I think having spring meeting to get all web dev interests & feedback |
| 19:27 | <rniwa> | smaug____: and TPAC meeting to resolve open issues is a great combo IMO |
| 19:34 | <annevk> | rniwa: FWIW, Tess might be able to get some HTML meeting that we could also use for this |
| 19:34 | <annevk> | Also, I agree with all things here š |
| 19:34 | <smaug____> | web components isn't really part of WebApps charter anymore |
| 19:34 | <annevk> | hober: ^^ |
| 19:37 | <rniwa> | smaug____: oh, that's right. |