10:00
<haakonmh>
Hi
10:38
<Ms2ger>
annevk, https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/675#issuecomment-503452334
11:31
<annevk>
Ms2ger: basically, I think that PR depends on the outcome of https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/147#issuecomment-513274020
11:32
<Ms2ger>
annevk, ok, can you put that in the PR?
11:34
<annevk>
Ms2ger: added a comment
11:35
<Ms2ger>
Takk
12:13
<smaug____>
I wonder why the gray box moves when using ctrl+click: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#history-traversal-task-source, click on the term, the gray box opens. Then ctrl+click on different entries to open them in new tabs
12:13
<smaug____>
gray box moves to bottom left
12:13
<smaug____>
happens at least in Nightly and some version of Chrome
12:13
<smaug____>
(looks like Chrome 77)
12:21
<MikeSmith>
smaug____: I think that is by design
12:21
<MikeSmith>
to move it out of the way
12:21
<smaug____>
huh
12:21
<MikeSmith>
while still persisting it so that you can follow further backlinks
12:22
<annevk>
domfarolino: heya
12:22
<annevk>
domfarolino: if I comment on an HTML PR, I don't endorse a particular design on behalf of Firefox
12:22
<annevk>
domfarolino: in particular I'm not at all sure about this prefetch stuff
12:23
<MikeSmith>
smaug____: I think the rationale is that keeping the box in the middle of the text flow is more obtrusive
12:24
<MikeSmith>
the box moves after to navigate to one of them links
12:24
<domfarolino>
annevk: hello. ok, sorry I failed to capture that. I was assuming you were reviewing the PR to get it in a direction you were comfortable with
12:24
<MikeSmith>
maybe it should not move it if you are not navigating. I mean for the Ctrl+Click open-in-new-tab case
12:25
<annevk>
domfarolino: that would probably have been good, but I mostly gave high-level feedback (and it looks like only early feedback) and didn't do a design review
12:25
<smaug____>
it is odd for the UI to moves hundreds of pixels down
12:25
<annevk>
domfarolino: while you're here, how much data do you all have on prefetching?
12:26
<smaug____>
I've always thought it is just a bug in some script
12:26
<annevk>
domfarolino: afaik nobody does Vary: Cookie so you'll get all these weird cases where users are not logged in while they expected to be, right?
12:42
<domfarolino>
annevk: Not much right now, but we plan on coming into TPAC with some numbers. Right now we're working on starting to experiment with the redirect mode changes, and we're hoping to ship the SW-mode change too. We're deferring the credentials mode bits until credential-less navigation is more clear, as it will likely be too problematic now
12:42
<domfarolino>
cc yoav
12:46
<annevk>
domfarolino: note that if you don't patch credentials you don't close the XSLeaks hole
12:54
<annevk>
domfarolino: do you want to correct the blink-dev post or would it be better if I replied?
12:55
<domfarolino>
annevk: we wouldn't be shipping a partial solution, we just don't think it makes sense to make the credentials mode change yet.
12:55
<domfarolino>
annevk: you are referring to the prefetch request mode changes just to be clear right? I can correct it. Would you like me to mention that you don't fully endorse it, and that your review was not necessarily on behalf of Firefox/Mozilla?
12:56
<annevk>
domfarolino: yeah, https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints/issues/82#issuecomment-519082099 has some initial thoughts
12:57
<annevk>
domfarolino: thanks
13:20
<MikeSmith>
smaug____: Might be worth raising an issue. It arguably is a bug, if the user experience is surprising and unintuitive
13:28
<annevk>
domfarolino: in general if it's not on standards-positions it's best to assume Firefox has no position
13:29
<annevk>
domfarolino: unless someone explicitly said they were talking on behalf of Firefox
13:29
<annevk>
(and even then...)
13:29
<domfarolino>
annevk: That's the impression I've been getting
13:50
<domfarolino>
annevk: Updated the thread. unfortunately i had sent it with my google email address, which I've never used to send a message before, so the post is "under moderation" for a bit lol
14:06
<annevk>
heh