| 00:30 | <MikeSmith> | PSA, I see that the IETF is now exploring something they are calling “Evolving Documents”, which seem to be Living Standards by another name |
| 00:30 | <MikeSmith> | maybe |
| 00:30 | <MikeSmith> | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/O0okVR4_wqCh43QWtmJjNeYvsp8 |
| 00:30 | <MikeSmith> | https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/evolving-documents |
| 00:30 | <MikeSmith> | http://owl-stretching-time.com/presentations/slides_evolvingdocuments/#/ |
| 00:31 | <MikeSmith> | hmm, or maybe “Checkpoint Drafts” now |
| 05:38 | <annevk> | Once https://developer.github.com/actions/managing-workflows/creating-and-cancelling-a-workflow/ is stable that might be a good fit for RD publication |
| 05:38 | <annevk> | MikeSmith: is it more than non-substantive errata? |
| 06:16 | <annevk> | “RFCs MAY NOT reference checkpoint docs” seems useless and also incorrect usage of 2119 |
| 08:27 | <MikeSmith> | annevk: Yeah, after looking through the presentation, I see it's not really what I'd assumed |
| 08:28 | <MikeSmith> | I now don't actually understand at all what the point of it is |
| 13:16 | <Domenic> | Yeah it seems like it's for non-specs mostly, sad. |
| 13:34 | <dtapuska> | Domenic: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4617 is still pending you to have a look |
| 13:35 | <Domenic> | dtapuska: on my list for today, thanks |
| 13:36 | <annevk> | dtapuska: Domenic: is this blocked on the questions in https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4782? |
| 13:38 | <Domenic> | Hmm I thought yesterday you said it was good and I should just have a look |
| 13:41 | <annevk> | Domenic: yeah, I think it's fine, and I don't think expanding on those scenarios will tell me something new, but I did mean to ask about it |
| 13:46 | <Domenic> | OK cool, will try to think about it |
| 16:01 | <Domenic> | dtapuska: do you feel like you have a plan for snapshotting/IPC issues in https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4787 ? |
| 17:14 | <dtapuska> | domenic: I'd like to hear from smaug____ on that one... I don't think it is hard to snapshot it.. but I don't know if it would do much good.. I think really the stuff boris is thinking should be fixed via not processing the IPCs |
| 18:26 | <annevk> | Would that be solved by grouping the IPC stuff so you don’t end up with races? |