| 01:31 | <MikeSmith> | The "79" version number in Edge means it’s based on Chromium 79, right? |
| 01:32 | <MikeSmith> | So can we assume that Microsoft plans to keep Edge version numbering in sync with Chrome version numbering? |
| 01:33 | <MikeSmith> | Or have Microsoft explicitly said anywhere that’s how they will be doing the version numbering? |
| 04:52 | <Domenic> | https://textslashplain.com/2019/08/08/livin-on-the-edge-dude-wheres-my-fix-redux/ comes close to stating that they intend to keep them in sync, but not quite |
| 05:01 | <MikeSmith> | Domenic: OK, thanks |
| 05:04 | <MikeSmith> | heh, may takeaway from reading that write-up is: To be unambiguous, Chrome and all Blink/Chromium-based browsers should just use the last part of the version number.. |
| 05:04 | <MikeSmith> | the part that is now 3983 |
| 05:05 | <MikeSmith> | so, Edge 3983 |
| 05:05 | <MikeSmith> | that’d be fun |
| 10:51 | <MikeSmith> | is there anything in any devtools that will give me the x and y coordinates of a the current position under the cursor? |
| 11:10 | <ondras> | yes |
| 11:10 | <ondras> | in Firefox |
| 11:10 | <MikeSmith> | ondras: how? |
| 11:10 | <ondras> | devtools |
| 11:10 | <ondras> | settings |
| 11:10 | <ondras> | "toolbox buttons" |
| 11:10 | <ondras> | "measure a portion of the page" |
| 11:11 | MikeSmith | tries it now |
| 11:13 | <MikeSmith> | ondras: perfect! |
| 11:13 | <MikeSmith> | exactly what I was looking for |
| 11:13 | <MikeSmith> | thanks much! |
| 11:14 | <ondras> | np :) |
| 15:37 | <domfarolino> | Domenic: long-term do you think tightening up the dfn for “intersects the viewport” would entail doing some sort of CSS box computation like Intersection Observer does for other things? |
| 15:38 | <Domenic> | domfarolino: maybe, it kind of depends on what that reviewer is asking for. Even IntersectionObserver just says something like "two boxes intersect" which is not significantly different from the existing definition for video. |
| 15:41 | <domfarolino> | Gotcha |
| 15:45 | <domfarolino> | Domenic: Also you’re right about the implementer interest for imagesrcset/imagesizes (sorry about that). Would filing a standards position issue have been the better approach? |
| 15:46 | <Domenic> | domfarolino: yeah probably; sometimes pinging works but standards-position is more likely to work. |
| 16:06 | <domfarolino> | Oh geez I read your comment in my email, not realizing it was made _on_ the standards-positions issue. I see... |