00:03
<ljharb>
sounds good, I’ll land that in a few hours
22:06
<Richard Gibson>
having reviewed https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/749 , all traces of my uncertainty regarding the ECMA-402 [[<alias>]] Record field indirection are gone. The patterns it has enabled are atrocious.
23:08
<bakkot>
shu: do you care to review https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2898? it's good to go otherwise I think
23:32
<shu>
bakkot: glancing at it, i think i would