00:22
<The_8472>
<jarek> I have an app that shows a preview of the website, I would like to put a horizontal line in the place where page fold is <- uh yeah... how about different screen sizes?
00:23
<The_8472>
or even browser viewport sizes
00:23
<The_8472>
ah damn, he quit
00:23
<gesa>
Clearly I have been spending too much time in THE FUTURE because I just assumed it was all adaptive...
00:25
<The_8472>
the point is that it can change, so how can you adapt to future changes?
00:27
<gesa>
I suppose it depends entirely on the use case.
00:28
<The_8472>
probably, yes. but if it's about trying to optimize for any particular size then it would be a bad idea
00:28
<gesa>
I concur. The idea of optimizing for a specific size didn't even occur to me because I forgot people still do that.
00:30
<The_8472>
i had to fight tooth and nail to get *one* dynamic width page into a 1024x786 "optimized" (read: fixed width layout) backend to cram all that information in there
00:32
<gesa>
I don't follow. One site with a fixed width layout and a single dynamic width page? What do you mean 1024x786 backend?
00:35
<gesa>
(bear with me. I've been coding html email all day. brain kaput.)
00:35
<The_8472>
corporate software with a web interface. it's using a fixed width layout, optimized for that resolution. and they wanted an overview page where you can get all the relevant information at one glance (if possible)
00:35
<gesa>
oh jesus.
00:35
<The_8472>
so to cram as much information onto a single page i proposed a dynamic width layout to make use of the screen space on larger monitors
00:35
<The_8472>
of course i was rattling on some sacrosanct "guidelines" there...
11:09
<annevk>
There are three bugs on caretBlinkRate but there is no such feature in the specification? Am I missing something?
11:19
<Ms2ger>
Might be a W3Cism
11:20
<annevk>
http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/ cannot find it
11:21
<annevk>
oh wait I can
11:25
<annevk>
I guess Microsoft will implement that feature?
11:25
<annevk>
Is anyone planning on implementing it?
11:27
<Ms2ger>
Don't see a bug over here
11:57
<annevk>
Does anyone know if it is easy to file RFC errata?
11:58
<annevk>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2388 talks about application/x-url-encoded rather than application/x-www-form-urlencoded
12:02
<Philip`>
Does anybody bother to read errata?
12:03
Philip`
usually forgets about them even if he's aware there's an errata page, so they seem a bit useless :-(
12:04
<annevk>
I guess at some point there's enough bugs to consider issuing a new draft
12:26
<rabbi1>
how can i get "A List Apart" code ?
12:47
<gsnedders>
annevk: AFAIK it's not too hard if the authors of the RFC care at all, if you just follow the normal form
13:09
<asmodai>
Mmm
13:09
<asmodai>
interesting
13:10
<asmodai>
So Safari 5.1 tries to do MathML
13:10
<asmodai>
I wonder what it is trying to use for a font for part of this rendering
13:10
<asmodai>
Giving me boxes for parts of the rendering (mostly braces and the likes)
13:13
<annevk>
Ah I found a form
13:19
<annevk>
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2388&eid=2937 done
14:53
<david_carlisle>
asmodai:on safari mathml, it probably assumes stix fonts (which i gather are distributed with the latest osx, or are freely available otherwise.
14:53
<asmodai>
ah
14:54
<asmodai>
david_carlisle: will install those later. thought it would have sensible defaults to the Win 7 math fonts
14:54
<asmodai>
ff at least does.
14:55
<asmodai>
jeez, they really need to update their site again
14:56
<david_carlisle>
asmodai: it would be even more sensible if the cambria math windows font was distributed with a licence that meant it could be used on other platfoms (like the original ms core fonts)
15:01
<gsnedders>
david_carlisle: There's no way MS is going to do that again, though, sadly. They consider fonts too much of a competitive advantage now…
15:01
<david_carlisle>
gsnedders: probbaly, shame though as it's a nice font.
15:02
<gsnedders>
Indeed. Nobody buys an OS because of what fonts it has, so it's not really an advantage.
15:06
<zewt>
sure they do
15:06
<zewt>
if Joe Consumer sees linux next to windows in a store, and due to having second-rate fonts linux looks unpolished next to Windows, that'll easily nudge decisions a little
15:34
<gsnedders>
zewt: Well, okay, but by-and-large fonts are "good enough".
15:53
<annevk>
Has anyone tallied email on www-tag?
15:53
<annevk>
E.g. useful vs euh what is going on?
15:57
<jarek>
Hi
15:58
<jarek>
is there any standard describing which CSS featuers should be supported in print stylesheets?
15:58
<Ms2ger>
All of them
15:58
<jarek>
but most browsers ignore e.g. outlines and backgrounds
15:59
<jarek>
which of course make sense
15:59
<jarek>
is this behavior non-standard?
15:59
<jarek>
s/make/makes
15:59
<Ms2ger>
"The following are links to the Editor's draft of the geolocation documents, they are not final and should NOT be relied upon by implementors."
15:59
<Ms2ger>
Nice one
15:59
<Ms2ger>
jarek, see the thread on www-style
16:03
<jarek>
Ms2ger: do you mean this thread? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0269.html
16:03
<Ms2ger>
Yep
16:05
<jarek>
is there a reference table that would list which CSS properties are not supported by browsers when using print media type?
16:38
<AryehGregor>
TabAtkins, why don't you just make zero-height and zero-width radial gradients invalid syntax, so they get ignored? Is there any use for them?
16:46
<astearns>
normal, legitimate gradients under transforms approach zero-width and zero-height, so we still need to decide what to do with them
19:11
<webben>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-xml/2011Aug/0010.html : because Microsoft is well keen on "portable" file formats. ;)
19:14
<Ms2ger>
He might agree with annevk, but I doubt annevk would agree with him
19:14
<Ms2ger>
Anyway, happy I stayed out of that
19:22
<Philip`>
So Microsoft should fully implement HTML5 (plus CURIEs) in XSD1.1 in order to help solve the US healthcare crisis?
19:22
<Philip`>
Sounds like a good plan to me
19:22
<webben>
Yes that was also ... an interesting suggesting.
19:22
<webben>
*suggestion
19:23
<MikeSmith>
webben: thanks fighting the good fight in bugzilla, man
19:23
Ms2ger
wonder where webben had a fight
19:23
<webben>
MikeSmith: Hey, yw :)
19:24
Ms2ger
also wonder why can't tpye
19:24
<MikeSmith>
Philip`: can anybody really claim at this point that a giant red fag was not raised about CURIEs a gazillion years ago?
19:25
<Ms2ger>
A giant red fag?
19:25
<MikeSmith>
um
19:25
<MikeSmith>
FLAG
19:26
<Ms2ger>
Oh
19:26
<Ms2ger>
Yes, that does make more sense
19:26
<MikeSmith>
typing on iPad is an adventure
19:28
<Philip`>
Choosing a name strongly associated with cancer doesn't seem like a good sign either :-(
19:28
<Ms2ger>
Philip`++
19:29
<MikeSmith>
anyway, the message now appears to be, WE are the ones willing to compromise, and you are not. therefore we are justified in continuing the same bs we havw
19:29
<MikeSmith>
oops
19:29
<MikeSmith>
anyway
19:30
<MikeSmith>
said enough already I guess
19:30
<Ms2ger>
Well, that's better than "Our design is cleaner. therefore we are justified in continuing the same bs"
19:31
<MikeSmith>
dunno
19:31
<Ms2ger>
What about "it's not worse"?
19:32
<MikeSmith>
but really, what pressure for change would there have ever been unless microdata had come along
19:32
<MikeSmith>
I wonder
19:33
<Philip`>
They should have called it an Abbreviated URI Character-Lessening Encoding, for a more ear-related association, or something along those lines
19:33
<Ms2ger>
MikeSmith, meh, wondering... I prefer ranting on public-webapps :)
19:34
<MikeSmith>
yeah, well, microdata was clearly not a mistake
19:34
<MikeSmith>
however dudes might like to try to rewrite history now
19:34
<Ms2ger>
Ah, but the winners get to do that
19:35
<Ms2ger>
So if Hixie ever gets bored of this kind of science fiction, he can write his autobiography
19:36
<MikeSmith>
oh man
19:36
<Philip`>
Rewriting history after you've won is less useful than rewriting history while you're still fighting in order to help you win
19:37
<MikeSmith>
Ms2ger: that would sell like hotcakes for sure
19:37
<Ms2ger>
I'd buy one
19:38
<Ms2ger>
But only if I get an autograph
19:38
<MikeSmith>
Philip`: no winners here, unfortunately
19:39
<MikeSmith>
just an should-have-been-avoidable mess
19:43
<Philip`>
Ms2ger: Traditional autobiographies are obsolete before they've even been printed - it ought to be a continually-updated living autobiography instead
19:43
<Philip`>
I guess you could tell a lot about people's attempts to rewrite history if the history had an SVN log
21:56
<Hixie>
i may have to temporarily disable pdf production unless someone else wants to provide a web service that i can call to get them generated
21:57
<Hixie>
right now the setup i have is spiking ram consumption over 1GB each time they are generated and i don't have the time to go fix it
22:07
<Hixie>
christ the websocket protocol has been messed up
22:07
<Hixie>
i just noticed that they totally broke how the origin headers work and the spec self-contradicts itself all over about it
22:26
<yuhong>
Is hsivonen here?
22:28
<Philip`>
yuhong: No
22:28
<yuhong>
I was going to report an internal error.
22:29
<yuhong>
Validate anandtech.com using validator.nu.