| 00:00 | <tantek> | with a URL that people could look at |
| 00:00 | <tantek> | and see what terms/vocab was (re)used |
| 00:00 | <tantek> | it's a hypothetical example |
| 00:00 | <tantek> | example.org is better though - good idea |
| 00:00 | <tantek> | less likely to be blindly copy/pasted |
| 00:01 | Hixie | looks at rfc487 instead of 4287 and gets very confused :-P |
| 00:01 | <tantek> | lol |
| 00:01 | <Hixie> | ah, atom |
| 00:01 | <Hixie> | makes sense |
| 00:01 | <tantek> | so sure. example.org/rfc4287 ;) |
| 00:01 | <Hixie> | and i already have a reference, awesome |
| 00:07 | <Hixie> | ok i've marked the old schema.org example as being for the whatwg spec only, and added an example based on the one you suggested. |
| 00:07 | <Hixie> | should be up momentarily on the single-page copy |
| 00:08 | <Hixie> | tantek: k, new example is up, just before the one that's whatwg-only |
| 00:08 | <tantek> | reloading |
| 00:10 | <tantek> | Hixie, with all this example updating, would it be too much to ask to fix the hCalendar example as well since you're in that area? |
| 00:10 | <tantek> | (or does that mess up your bug resolution stats ;) ) |
| 00:11 | <tantek> | (new fictional microdata vocab example looks good) |
| 00:11 | tantek | goes to review data element while he's here on the single-page version |
| 00:14 | <Hixie> | if we can consider it part of the same issue, sure |
| 00:15 | <Hixie> | i don't want to be making changes to the spec that aren't in the htmlwg copy |
| 00:15 | <tantek> | yeah |
| 00:15 | <Hixie> | it's bad enough that we're diverged so much as it is (which was caused by having things in flight when the chairs decided to force mike to do his stuff) |
| 00:15 | <tantek> | trying to figure out how to make your one patch address multiple issues / change proposals simultaneously |
| 00:15 | <tantek> | yeah, apologies again for failing to realize how bad that was going to be and failing to object to the revert / and/or ask for a delay |
| 00:16 | <tantek> | (I was on that telcon) |
| 00:16 | <Hixie> | i'm still baffled by why the chairs decided to do it this way instead of following their process |
| 00:16 | <Hixie> | (i.e. reopen the bug) |
| 00:16 | <tantek> | I don't quite understand the revert request process |
| 00:16 | <Hixie> | but whatever |
| 00:16 | <Hixie> | i'm letting you deal with it :-) |
| 00:16 | <tantek> | fair enough |
| 00:16 | <Hixie> | gotta move to another room, one moment. then will examine the hcalendar thing. |
| 00:17 | <tantek> | ok |
| 00:23 | <tantek> | data element description seems fine |
| 00:23 | <tantek> | couple of notes |
| 00:23 | <tantek> | interesting that value attribute is required |
| 00:23 | <tantek> | I guess that makes sense |
| 00:23 | <tantek> | would there be any value in <data> without value? |
| 00:23 | <tantek> | or is that just a span? |
| 00:23 | <TabAtkins> | It's just <span> at that ponit. |
| 00:24 | <tantek> | the only minor difference I can think of: |
| 00:24 | <tantek> | span can be / is just used for styling hooks sometimes |
| 00:24 | <tantek> | data would be an explicit way of saying "this is data" |
| 00:24 | <tantek> | but that's pretty minor |
| 00:24 | <tantek> | not worth quibbling or changing the spec about |
| 00:25 | <TabAtkins> | The presence of @itemprop on <span> also says that. |
| 00:25 | <tantek> | let's see how web developers use <data> |
| 00:26 | <tantek> | TabAtkins, thanks for your updates to http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Tantekelik/data_element |
| 00:26 | <TabAtkins> | np |
| 00:33 | <tantek> | updated with Contributors section |
| 00:46 | <Hixie> | tantek: ok, fixing hcalendar example |
| 00:46 | <Hixie> | should be up |
| 00:47 | <Hixie> | tantek: anything else? |
| 00:48 | <Hixie> | if not i'll reply to sam saying that i've worked with you to address his concerns |
| 00:49 | <tantek> | Hixie thanks - checking |
| 00:49 | <tantek> | also, I just wrote up a fourth change proposal to handle the year week only dates |
| 00:49 | <tantek> | http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Tantekelik/time_input_match |
| 00:51 | <Hixie> | k |
| 00:51 | <tantek> | I believe the four change proposals I've written up at http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Tantekelik#change_proposals now cover the edits in your patch |
| 00:51 | <Hixie> | cool |
| 00:51 | <tantek> | or vice versa |
| 00:52 | <tantek> | temporal order isn't that relevant right? |
| 00:52 | <Hixie> | yeah, i was gonna say, more vice versa :-) |
| 00:53 | <Hixie> | do you want to reply to sam or should i? |
| 00:53 | <tantek> | I'll go ahead since I wrote up the 4th change proposal, as that will require raising a 4th issue to be addressed by the 4th change proposal |
| 00:54 | <Hixie> | cool, thanks |
| 00:54 | tantek | digs through his email |
| 01:10 | <tantek> | email sent. awaiting the 30 second "Undo" delay ;) |
| 01:10 | <tantek> | Hixie, since you've updated your patch, you may want to send that to the list |
| 01:11 | <Hixie> | k |
| 01:14 | <tantek> | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0186.html |
| 01:22 | <tantek-ipod> | Ok going mobile. Will try to lurk for a while in case there are any other time related discussions. Maybe see some of you (sf folks) at Ilya's memorial tonight. (see plancast.com/t ) |
| 10:07 | heycam | laughs at the grindr related bug raised on the spec |
| 14:04 | <adtykfhyipoh> | hey can someone invite me to #php? |
| 14:06 | <adtykfhyipoh> | I need help with pp |
| 14:06 | <adtykfhyipoh> | *php |
| 14:11 | <adtykfhyipoh> | hello |
| 14:11 | <adtykfhyipoh> | please help |
| 14:11 | <adtykfhyipoh> | where are php file uploads stored by default? I need to set permissions |
| 14:23 | <erlehmann> | wat |
| 22:38 | <Margle> | paul_irish: cool talk bro |
| 22:38 | <paul_irish> | thxx |