02:05
<jamesr_>
man. i really vividly remember a fairly long email thread with some mozillians about the element parameter in requestAnimationFrame but can't find it
02:08
<jamesr_>
ah! found it. had a pretty bad thread title
02:09
<paul_irish>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2011May/0015.html ?
03:36
<ZXY>
sorry to ask this here, but on certain sites, the font for forms seems to have changed to my browser's serif font
03:36
<ZXY>
Trying to look for firefox's default css file but can't seem to find it/them
03:45
<MikeSmith>
http://www.robglidden.com/2011/12/royalty-free-mpeg-proposals-announced/
03:48
<MikeSmith>
http://www.robglidden.com/2011/12/mpeg-plus-or-patent-pool-lite-mpeg-mulls-royalty-free-proposals/
03:48
<MikeSmith>
Rob Glidden hath awakened
03:53
<zewt>
because clearly "royalty free" is basically the same as "open standard", right? *cough*
04:02
<MikeSmith>
“It seems every few months a patent pool or some one manages to spin up wishful thinking that there will soon be a “new deal” that will answer the needs of royalty free communities, only to cleverly leave the hopeful twisting in the wind."
04:17
<MikeSmith>
earthshake
04:18
<MikeSmith>
Chiba
05:25
<Hixie>
is there a sane way of seeing if a variable is an integer (in JS) without doing string manipulation? sites seem to suggest using parseInt(), which as far as i can tell is silly.
05:27
<zewt>
Math.floor(i) == i?
05:29
<Hixie>
yeah i guess that's as good as anything
05:29
<Hixie>
thanks
05:30
<zewt>
though it's true for Infinity
05:30
<Hixie>
not an issue here
05:30
<Hixie>
i just want to find where in my !$#@%$#@& code i'm passing a fraction for something that much later gets used as an array index
13:12
<gsnedders>
Hixie: If you only care about int32, i | 0 === i, uint32 i >>> 0 === i, otherwise round and compare works.
13:46
<annevk>
oh
13:46
<annevk>
2d context spec is unforked now
20:25
<Ms2ger>
annevk5, I figured out why web-apps-tracker was broken
20:25
<Ms2ger>
The editorial changes checkbox got turned off somehow
22:22
<smaug____>
it is sad what Google is doing to the web :(
22:39
<Taggnostr>
smaug____, what is Google doing?
22:40
<bga>
making web binary
22:41
<fjkeorjer>
You mean this: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=062b5ce9408431aa&hl=en ???
22:44
<smaug____>
I was thinking about NaCl, Dash, and making some of their services available only to their client software etc..
22:47
<fjkeorjer>
You mean you cannot hook-up an app written in Dash to a php backend?
22:50
<gsnedders>
Dart, if it makes it into Chrome, will give a better UX than in any other browser.
22:51
<smaug____>
Dash, Dart, whatever
22:52
<fjkeorjer>
So what's different between the two?
22:52
<gsnedders>
They're the same.
22:52
<gsnedders>
Dash was the internal code name pre-launch, announced as Dart.
22:53
<fjkeorjer>
So how does it work with server software?
22:53
<gsnedders>
It doesn't.
22:53
<gsnedders>
It's no different to JS, it doesn't.
22:54
<fjkeorjer>
That sucks, this makes it useless for me
22:56
<Dashiva>
Damn Dash, I'm going to have to change my highlights
22:58
<smaug____>
Sorry Dashiva :)
22:59
<fjkeorjer>
Indian goddess Dashiva?
23:00
<bga>
gsnedders ppl want native types and syntax for classes
23:00
<bga>
thay tired to invent class sugar for js
23:00
<bga>
thay want real private fields
23:01
<bga>
etc
23:01
<Ms2ger>
Those are coming to JS, obviously
23:01
<bga>
those was in js
23:01
<bga>
as es4
23:03
<Dashiva>
fjkeorjer: If you're referring to Shiva, god not goddess
23:03
<Dashiva>
Square has a lot to answer for there
23:05
<bga>
Ms2ger anyway in future nobody will use js in web. js's jit allow write erlang/jvm/... vm over js
23:05
<bga>
ppl now have choose
23:07
<bga>
as result js will outdated thechnology and web will switch to NaCl
23:07
<bga>
only node.js same some community
23:07
<bga>
*save