| 01:28 | <MikeSmith> | GPHemsley: yeah I properly specified an e-mail address |
| 01:29 | <MikeSmith> | GPHemsley: the second one was me re-trying with a different username and the same e-mail address |
| 04:04 | <estellevw> | my understanding was that the datetime input type was removed from the spec in favor of datetime-local, but I still see it in the whatwg specs: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/forms.html#date-and-time-state-(type=datetime) |
| 04:04 | <estellevw> | with chrome supporting all of the date/times except "datetime" itself. |
| 04:04 | <estellevw> | Anyone know the status? |
| 04:05 | <tantek> | estellevw - lots is being dropped from W3C HTML5 in the pursuit to actually exit CR with tests and interoperability |
| 04:05 | <tantek> | WHATWG HTML still has anything that anyone has at least some interest in. |
| 04:05 | <tantek> | so it's more "live" as a result |
| 04:05 | <tantek> | and don't even get me started on *all* the confusion around datetime vs. datetime-local etc. |
| 04:05 | <estellevw> | The w3c actually only has time and date listed, not week, month or anthing else |
| 04:06 | <tantek> | that's right, like I said, lots being dropped for lack of interest, implementation, or real world use |
| 04:07 | <estellevw> | all the other 12 new imput types have wide ranging support, |
| 04:10 | <estellevw> | thanks tantek. Also, it was good to see you last night. |
| 04:11 | <tantek> | estellevw: it was good to see you too. and chat about all the things. this stuff all matters. |
| 06:01 | <TabAtkins> | zcorpan: There were two threads, one about changing the overloads and one about adding a "within" attr to the ScrollOptions dict. |
| 06:20 | <TabAtkins> | jgraham: gsnedders: I know for a fact that it'll parse unknown elements just fine - I use them on occasion in Bikeshed (temporarily) |
| 06:21 | <SamB> | TabAtkins: is that not a (secret) requirement of the HTML spec? |
| 06:22 | <TabAtkins> | It is indeed. |
| 08:12 | <Ms2ger> | b.innerHTML = "<input type='radio' checked='checked' name='t'/>", l.checkClone = b.cloneNode(!0).cloneNode(!0).lastChild.checked |
| 08:12 | <Ms2ger> | Wat |
| 11:29 | <metaspike> | hihi |
| 13:04 | <gsnedders> | TabAtkins: yes, it'll parse unknown elements, but that isn't the same as what the spec requires for template AFAIK |
| 16:27 | <TabAtkins> | gsnedders: Ah, yes, template definitely requires special parsing. |
| 17:21 | <caitp> | you might find this amusing --- or maybe not --- https://www.change.org/en-CA/petitions/w3c-stop-letting-google-propose-and-monopolize-internet-standards-without-ensuring-fair-and-adequate-discussion |
| 18:30 | <TabAtkins> | caitp: Hahahahahahaha, and also the reddit screencap from further down shows that achen2345 person is cray-cray. |
| 19:26 | <annevk> | GPHemsley: are you planning on replying to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2014Jul/0118.html at some point? |
| 20:15 | <annevk> | Did anyone here know gb18030 has a BOM as well? |
| 20:15 | <annevk> | Bytes 84 31 95 33; need to test that |
| 21:01 | <GPHemsley> | annevk: Hmm... it seems my e-mail filters have failed me. Thanks for the heads-up. |
| 21:09 | <GPHemsley> | (even knowing that the e-mail exists, I'm having trouble getting a search/filter to match it) |
| 22:05 | <Streusel> | How does one go about removing a metaextension? |
| 22:35 | <GPHemsley> | annevk: I responded, but I basically punted it back to you. |
| 23:08 | <MikeSmith> | Streusel: you just remove it and note the reason in the comment when you submit the change |
| 23:08 | <Streusel> | alright |
| 23:09 | <MikeSmith> | which by the way please actually do write a comment when you make any changes |
| 23:10 | <Streusel> | noted |