| 01:03 | <MikeSmith> | Streusel: I'll try to find somebody to check up on the wiki e-mail thing today |
| 02:20 | <zewt> | my new favorite thing in documentation: "undocumented" http://www.adobe.com/devnet-apps/photoshop/fileformatashtml/#50577409_17115 |
| 02:20 | <zewt> | at least they say so |
| 02:42 | <Streusel> | xD |
| 02:57 | <SamB> | zewt: hmm, is that the TODO kind of undocumented or the DANGER \n HIGH VOLTAGE kind? |
| 03:15 | <zewt> | seems more like the "we added this field that we needed and we don't care enough about this documentation to update it" |
| 03:16 | <SamB> | so basically "TODO, suckers!" |
| 03:17 | <zewt> | "some manager made someone write this documentation as a PR thing a decade ago and we have no incentive to spend time updating it" |
| 03:17 | <zewt> | surprised the doc exists in the first place |
| 03:19 | <SamB> | hmm, point ;-) |
| 03:24 | <caitp> | technical writing is more tedious than accounting, maybe they decided the cycles were better-spent doing other things |
| 03:25 | <SamB> | hmm |
| 03:25 | <SamB> | really more tedious? |
| 03:25 | <SamB> | I'm not sure you're doing it write if that's so; sounds error-prone ... |
| 03:26 | <caitp> | I don't do it |
| 03:26 | <caitp> | I don't do my own accounting either |
| 03:26 | <SamB> | (Doesn't even really matter if your *text* is correct, if it is overly tedious ...) |
| 03:26 | <SamB> | (... nobody will be able to read it without error either, then!) |
| 09:15 | <zcorpan> | TabAtkins: what was the other cssom issue? |
| 12:59 | <jomici> | hi, I have a question about html5lib: can it be used to parse files containing a web component instead of a classic "html page" with header/body etc? |
| 13:03 | <Ms2ger> | Probably not yet |
| 13:28 | <jgraham> | Well it will parse them. But possibly not exactly correctly. And it won't do anyting magic with the component |
| 14:34 | <gsnedders> | s/possibly/quite probably/ |
| 15:27 | <GPHemsley> | MikeSmith: Still having wiki issues? |
| 16:40 | <MikeSmith> | GPHemsley: password message for new user Streusel never got sent, though the system claims it sent it |
| 16:45 | <jgraham> | MikeSmith: Never got sent or never got received? |
| 17:10 | <MikeSmith> | jgraham: never received |
| 17:10 | <MikeSmith> | no way to tell if it was actually ever sent |
| 17:12 | <jgraham> | Could have ended up in spam or something |
| 17:12 | <MikeSmith> | he says he checked all that and found no sign of it |
| 17:33 | <gsnedders> | Census data is so diabolically bad. Yup, that 55 year old is definitely a son of of a 50 year old. |
| 18:23 | GPHemsley | sense gsnedders is doing genealogy... |
| 18:25 | <GPHemsley> | MikeSmith: Did you properly specify an e-mail address? And what's the second user creation? |
| 19:06 | <gsnedders> | GPHemsley: you may be right there :) |
| 19:06 | <GPHemsley> | ;) |
| 19:11 | <gsnedders> | (my great grandfather is pretty much entirely a mystery, except for the fact that he was an alcoholic and was cut off from the rest of his family) |
| 19:11 | <gsnedders> | Which, incidently enough, is why he's a mystery. :P |