| 06:36 | <mathiasbynens> | FWIW, Cătălin is the driving force behind https://github.com/h5bp/server-configs-apache/blob/master/dist/.htaccess. If anyone understands Apache configuration, it’s him |
| 07:19 | <kalimann> | hi, anybody know why my picture with transparency in it gets becomes greyed out in that area? instead of showing through to the white background |
| 07:20 | <cvrebert> | annevk: Apparent typo in title of https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/61 "Path" -> "Patch" |
| 07:39 | <kalimann> | hi can someone help me? :) |
| 07:40 | <kalimann> | "hi, anybody know why my picture with transparency in it gets becomes greyed out in that area? instead of showing through to the white background" |
| 07:44 | <kalimann> | like, only part of the image is invisible basically, and that will shown in image applications, but once i put it in the html it gets greyed out |
| 07:57 | <deltab> | kalimann: maybe it's not fully transparent, or maybe the element has a grey background |
| 07:58 | <deltab> | maybe the image was saved without transparency |
| 07:58 | <kalimann> | i fixed it. simple coding error. dumb mistake by me, sorry |
| 10:24 | <MikeSmith> | mathiasbynens: ah, yeah I thought I'd seen his name around before |
| 12:35 | <badmankali> | hi. im making a page now, where alot of elements are placed as theyre supposed to with css, with position: relative |
| 12:36 | <badmankali> | i have a small subtitle that i want to include next to the headline, but it moves everything insanely so when i insert it |
| 12:37 | <badmankali> | can i do it so with it moving everything, or should i change the other elements position tag to something else and readjust them, and then change it? |
| 12:49 | <nox> | annevk: Ping? |
| 12:49 | <nox> | annevk: Ms2ger pointed out to me that it was a bit scary to execute code on nodes of which children are in another document. |
| 12:50 | <nox> | annevk: Which is exactly what I did with my adopting steps patch, |
| 12:50 | <nox> | annevk: do you think that should be changed? |
| 13:29 | <annevk> | nox: maybe |
| 13:29 | <nox> | annevk: Can't find users of adopting steps but <template>, though. |
| 13:30 | <annevk> | nox: <img> |
| 13:30 | <nox> | Oh. |
| 13:32 | <nox> | annevk: Btw, the link of "adopting steps" directly goes to the DOM spec, |
| 13:32 | <nox> | annevk: isn't it supposed to link to the reference to the spec? |
| 13:56 | <annevk> | nox: not if the <dfn> has some kind of x-href attribute |
| 15:30 | <annevk> | I wonder where we should host some of the general WHATWG server configuration... |
| 15:30 | <annevk> | I guess we could create a "whatwg-servers" repository or some such with some information |
| 15:31 | <annevk> | It does seem that hosting such information inspires folks to contribute improvements |
| 15:50 | <annevk> | hsivonen: seems that only Gecko implemented ruby parser changes and style changes... |
| 16:03 | <MikeSmith> | annevk: apparently I now have enough juice on stackoverflow that I can create tags |
| 16:04 | <MikeSmith> | so I want to create one for Fetch |
| 16:04 | <MikeSmith> | shall it be fetch-standard or fetch-method? |
| 16:04 | <MikeSmith> | or something else? |
| 16:05 | <MikeSmith> | (I mean that people can use instead of or in addition to the existing generic "fetch" tag) |
| 16:06 | <MikeSmith> | and once I create I'll go back through some of the existing questions that are actually about Fetch, and add the tag to those |
| 16:07 | <annevk> | MikeSmith: we use fetchstandard on Twitter |
| 16:07 | <annevk> | MikeSmith: but maybe fetchapi is more catchy? |
| 16:08 | <annevk> | MikeSmith: I mean, I expect most questions will be about the API |
| 16:09 | <MikeSmith> | ok |
| 16:09 | <MikeSmith> | btw http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Furl.spec.whatwg.org%2F |
| 16:10 | <MikeSmith> | shows enough existing questions to justify a url-standard tag as well |
| 16:10 | <MikeSmith> | btw the convention at SO seems to be to use hyphens in multi-word tags afaict |
| 16:11 | <MikeSmith> | so I'll do fetch-api |
| 16:11 | <MikeSmith> | ok? |
| 16:11 | <MikeSmith> | "fetchapi" just looks odd anyway |
| 16:26 | <annevk> | Sure |
| 19:36 | <annevk> | http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=xhr.spec.whatwg.org shows that quite a few folks are being taught that synchronous IO is bad |
| 19:36 | <annevk> | Warning messages are rather effective |
| 20:36 | <caitp> | isnt "synchronous ajax" kind of nonsense? |