| 11:09 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | A Babel contributor has opened a pull request for adding an optional pipe operator spelled as |
| 18:50 | <TabAtkins> | I'm on record as thinking an optional pipe would be worthwhile; pipe fills the same syntax role as method chaining and .?() is useful. |
| 18:53 | <TabAtkins> | (But I'm more than happy to keep it on the back burner as a follow-on proposal.) |