| 07:16 | <eemeli> | Chris de Almeida: It turns out that I was able to add the event myself at least to the private calendar by inviting it with its calendar id. |
| 07:18 | <eemeli> | So I guess its access control is currently working thanks to security by obscurity. |
| 07:36 | <eemeli> | It looks like the public calendar doesn't auto-accept invites. |
| 13:00 | <Chris de Almeida> | Chris de Almeida: It turns out that I was able to add the event myself at least to the private calendar by inviting it with its calendar id. |
| 14:54 | <eemeli> | generally what will happen when you do this, is that the meeting will disappear some time later |
| 15:15 | <Chris de Almeida> | Promise.race(yulia, chris) |
| 15:15 | <yulia> | haha |
| 15:15 | <Chris de Almeida> | I deleted mine, but you might want to update to use the built-in google meet |
| 15:16 | <Chris de Almeida> | also updated to add the public calendar |
| 15:16 | <yulia> | I asked eemeli, and he said that people invited via another invite have the meeting id |
| 15:17 | <yulia> | so he prefers to use the original one |
| 15:17 | <yulia> | i changed the settings on the calendar |
| 15:17 | <Chris de Almeida> | ah sure, if he's keeping that calendar item, then g2g |
| 15:17 | <yulia> | it will no longer show invites, but i suppose we could have someone accepting those invites and then they would show up |
| 15:18 | <yulia> | we can discuss this during facilitation planning |
| 16:28 | <ptomato> | in spec language, if you have an AO with arguments (required, [ optional ]), can you pass the absent argument to another AO where it is also optional? e.g. Perform OtherOperation(required, optional) |
| 16:29 | <ptomato> | or do you have to do something like this? If optional is present, perform OtherOperation(required, optional). Else, perform OtherOperation(required). |
| 16:29 | <shu> | i have always done the latter |
| 16:29 | <shu> | i think it is too confusing if optional is present in the text, but actually means "perfect forwarding" |
| 16:30 | <shu> | we could invent new perfect forwarding syntax but i don't think the case comes up often enough to warrant it |