20:47 | <TabAtkins> | snek: "kinda nuts that this moved forward" and "i don't have anything new to add" are in conflict. If you see something wrong, open an issue; don't just complain in the chatroom. |
21:30 | <snek> | apologies, I'll refrain from commenting on wicg matters in the future |
21:38 | <littledan> | heh I added issues and I didn't see a response from the repo maintainers. I don't know the right path for critical feedback on these sorts of proposals. |
21:40 | <littledan> | (I'm still not so happy that the README implies that TC39 prefers that this be done at the web platform level, or that it was presented to the committee in 2019; the complaints in TC39 about Observables the last time it was presented, in 2016, came from me and Domenic, and they were not about that. I did file an issue about this, and this is a TC39-related observation.) |
21:41 | <Chris de Almeida> | heh I added issues and I didn't see a response from the repo maintainers. I don't know the right path for critical feedback on these sorts of proposals. |
21:51 | <littledan> | is Ben not a maintainer? |
21:53 | <Chris de Almeida> | yeah, I don't think they have regular meetings. issues on the repo are the right place for feedback, but I'm not sure how to improve outcomes beyond perhaps @ tagging folks but that's going to be excessive in many cases |
21:55 | <Chris de Almeida> | didn't mean to delete that message |
22:13 | <littledan> | (what did the deleted message say?) |
22:24 | <Chris de Almeida> | oh, it wasn't particularly valuable, so I didn't rewrite it. I was merely speculating on why feedback might be slow/limited, based on my observations of repo activity |
22:25 | <TabAtkins> | apologies, I'll refrain from commenting on wicg matters in the future |
22:27 | <snek> | there are a lot of wrong things in the world. i don't have the time or inclination to deal with all of them. i'm sorry i expressed my opinion that way earlier in this channel, it would have been more appropriate elsewhere. |