| 01:43 | <canadahonk> | are there docs which suggesting timeboxes anywhere or are past meetings my best bet? |
| 02:01 | <ljharb> | it’s just based on how much time you think you’ll need |
| 02:02 | <canadahonk> | also just wondering from looking at february's agenda, is there a particular reason you use stage -1 vs 0? |
| 18:11 | <Michael Ficarra> | also just wondering from looking at february's agenda, is there a particular reason you use stage -1 vs 0? |
| 19:06 | <ljharb> | By convention only, until it’s on an agenda with a champion it’s not stage 0 yet, otherwise everyone in earth’s random ideas are stage 0 |
| 19:34 | <Ashley Claymore> | Wouldn't "on an agenda with a champion" be "entrance criteria", which the document says there are none. An idea on the back of a napkin being stage 0 sounds OK to me |
| 21:40 | <ljharb> | yes, which is why i said by convention |
| 21:41 | <ljharb> | considering every random idea stage 0 makes the category useless, which is why the proposals repo has used the convention i described as its filter. |