| 01:25 | <bakkot> | I made a bot for rendering better (i.e., linkable) logs for matrix channels, for tc39's use. if ya'll would like I can have it do this channel too. currently logs are at https://bakkot.github.io/matrix-logs/, or you can run it yourself from https://github.com/bakkot/matrix-archive-bot |
| 01:26 | <bakkot> | logs are going to be a bit behind because I'm not bothering to have it monitor continuously |
| 02:27 | <sideshowbarker> | I made a bot for rendering better (i.e., linkable) logs for matrix channels, for tc39's use. if ya'll would like I can have it do this channel too. currently logs are at https://bakkot.github.io/matrix-logs/, or you can run it yourself from https://github.com/bakkot/matrix-archive-bot |
| 02:53 | <bakkot> | Done: https://bakkot.github.io/matrix-logs/WHATWG/ |
| 02:54 | <sideshowbarker> | Done: https://bakkot.github.io/matrix-logs/WHATWG/ |
| 04:54 | <sideshowbarker> | For anybody here interested in helping improve content at MDN, https://github.com/mdn/content/issues/5523 is maybe a good first issue that would probably take only 30 minutes or so of work |
| 04:56 | <sideshowbarker> | The work would be writing some additional text that elaborates on the following statement:
|
| 07:46 | <zcorpan_> | zcorpan_: there was already a zcorpan without underscore? :-) |
| 07:48 | <annevk> | zcorpan_: ah, sucks. You could probably find another server as well if you want and get an account there, but not sure how much effort you want to put into it. |
| 07:51 | <zcorpan_> | annevk: I'll wait until someone tells me it's possible to reclaim the old name :) |
| 07:53 | <MayeulC> | Well, you can still change your display name to one without the underscore. |
| 07:55 | <zcorpan> | π |
| 10:37 | <sideshowbarker> | heya Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders] |
| 10:37 | <sideshowbarker> | annevk: if/when you have time, it would be good to have a comment from you at https://github.com/mdn/content/issues/5501 |
| 10:40 | <Ms2ger> | π |
| 10:44 | <annevk> | I wish Matrix had "done" / "ack" / "this" / etc. reactions besides emoji. |
| 11:46 | <sideshowbarker> | I wish Matrix had "done" / "ack" / "this" / etc. reactions besides emoji. |
| 11:48 | <sideshowbarker> | Per that discussion, you can do it already in some Matrix clients |
| 11:48 | <sideshowbarker> | ...just not in Element |
| 12:28 | <MayeulC> | I reacted with a few frequently-used examples:
You can send custom events via devtools in element, but it's a hassle. At the end of the day, it's a matter of convention. I quite liked some CI bot that indicated runner status with π’ π΄ π . |
| 12:29 | <ryzokuken> | Fluffychat has pretty solid support for custom emotes already. |
| 15:54 | <lpd> | lpd: per spec I think Chrome is wrong and I don't think there's an issue on changing this |
| 15:55 | <lpd> | The language "removed from that Document in some way" seems pretty weird to me, but the examples are clear in my novice reading. |
| 15:56 | <annevk> | lpd: none of the examples are about rendering though, but that is indeed extremely ambiguous; it likely wouldn't pass review if written today |
| 15:58 | <lpd> | annevk: In the main text, I believe it's covered by "it stops being a focusable area", since for an input element to be a focusable area it must meet "the element is either being rendered or being used as relevant canvas fallback content." |
| 15:58 | <annevk> | I guess focusable area is defined in terms of being rendered, yeah |
| 15:59 | <lpd> | The example box specifically mentions the hidden attribute, but I'm not sure if those are normative? |
| 16:00 | <annevk> | However, it doesn't seem to invoke an algorithm to change the focused area, meaning no events would dispatch and such and it's a bit unclear what state would change |
| 16:00 | <annevk> | Examples are non-normative, but they're also not supposed to be wrong :-) |
| 16:00 | <annevk> | lpd: I guess at this point I'd lean towards an issue against whatwg/html though |
| 16:01 | annevk | wonders if there is one already |
| 16:03 | <annevk> | (I only found other issues) |
| 16:04 | <lpd> |
annevk I believe the confusion comes from this, right? Whether this requires the focusing steps are run? |
| 16:04 | <annevk> | lpd: yeah |
| 16:05 | <lpd> | Cool thanks, I'll make one :) |
| 18:35 | <lpd> | https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6729 |