09:13 | <annevk> | hsivonen: have you made up your mind on how to deal with the gb18030 update? Or maybe Adam Rice looked into it? |
09:44 | <hsivonen> | hsivonen: have you made up your mind on how to deal with the gb18030 update? Or maybe Adam Rice looked into it? |
09:45 | <hsivonen> | Or are we talking about a different gb18030 update? |
09:53 | <annevk> | hsivonen: nah that one; https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23003r-gb18030-recommendations.pdf was also brought to my attention |
10:34 | <hsivonen> | hsivonen: nah that one; https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23003r-gb18030-recommendations.pdf was also brought to my attention |
11:08 | <annevk> | Andreu Botella: Luca Casonato: will either of you update https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1346? |
11:10 | <annevk> | I'm also happy to do some work if that would be easier. I think there's enough agreement to merge this and give it a go. |
11:53 | <Andreu Botella> | Andreu Botella: Luca Casonato: will either of you update https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1346? |
11:57 | <Andreu Botella> | or if Luca gave me write access to his branch |
12:00 | <annevk> | Andreu Botella: I gave you write access |
12:00 | <Andreu Botella> | thanks |
12:08 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Is there a place I'm missing where UI events create a task on the event loop? Seems like they don't and we rely on "SHOULD"-style somewhat implementation-specific behavior, but I wanted to make sure |
12:17 | <annevk> | Noam Rosenthal: the sequence of events should be that there's user input, which results in some computation and a task consisting of a set of steps, and those steps then end up dispatching the event |
12:17 | <annevk> | Noam Rosenthal: you're correct that UI events has been hand-wavy about this since say forever |
12:18 | <annevk> | Noam Rosenthal: there are some issues and depending on where you look you might find me complaining about it |
12:24 | <Noam Rosenthal> | annevk: gotcha, thanks for the context. |
14:59 | <hsivonen> | Ms2ger: What use case is this test ensuring proper support for? https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/1696 That is, are you aware of a use case where it's actually useful to load a search collation into the sorting-oriented API? I'm seriously considering sending an Intent to unship: Search collations. (Due to making libxul larger with no reasonable use case that I can see given the API surface available.) |
15:01 | <hsivonen> | (My question at https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/issues/256#issuecomment-979760435 has remained unanswered for over a year.) |
18:23 | <littledan> | Ms2ger: What use case is this test ensuring proper support for? https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/1696 That is, are you aware of a use case where it's actually useful to load a search collation into the sorting-oriented API? I'm seriously considering sending an Intent to unship: Search collations. (Due to making libxul larger with no reasonable use case that I can see given the API surface available.) |
18:24 | <littledan> | e.g., in one of their calls |
18:25 | <littledan> | I raised this in #tc39-ecma402:matrix.org |
21:22 | <TabAtkins> |
|
21:23 | <TabAtkins> | For example, if I buy a book from B&N for my Nook, by default it's in a proprietary format that's locked to my account. Luckily the DRM is easy to strip off to obtain the epub inside the container, so I can archive my book collection, but aiui the process is somewhat more difficult for Kindle books. |