| 13:38 | <annevk> | Dominic Farolino: Domenic: https://github.com/whatwg/sg/issues/63 is the latest public discussion on that |
| 18:12 | <help.you.guys> | Hello guys π₯°π₯° I wanted to let you know that I have a Telegram channel where I share some amazing Verified sauce and soft cashout Here are some of the things you can find on my channel π―π―π― I promise you that all the methods are real and legit. No scams here! And please don't worry about how much money you have. Just be honest and I'll try my best to help you out. So, if you're interested, please join my channel through the link below. See you there β β https://t.me/+fk5a2eNOe9BhY2I8 https://t.me/+fk5a2eNOe9BhY2I8 https://t.me/+fk5a2eNOe9BhY2I8 https://t.me/+fk5a2eNOe9BhY2I8 π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ πΈπΈπΈπΈ |
| 19:19 | <TabAtkins> | Hm, HTML is the authoritative definition of :state(), yeah? It's not just referencing another spec, right? (MDN links to HTML for it, at least.) |
| 19:19 | <TabAtkins> | (I ask because its definition isn't marked up correctly to be picked up for auto linking, and I'm making sure it's the right place before I drop a PR.) |
| 19:20 | <annevk> | TabAtkins: yes. Though I think for completeness there also needs to be a definition in Selectors for parsing purposes. |
| 19:21 | <TabAtkins> | Ah, ok, I'm happy to drop the canonical definition into Selectors, then. |
| 19:21 | <annevk> | TabAtkins: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#selector-custom is the current definition; I don't remember exactly why it doesn't have :state() in its name |
| 19:22 | <TabAtkins> | yeah, the name is wrong and it's not exported (like the other terms, which is correct for them since they're just internal dfns and should be deferring to the dfns in other specs) |
| 19:22 | <Domenic> | I thought we settled this with a for="" at some point... |
| 19:22 | <TabAtkins> | I'm not sure what a for='' would do here. |
| 19:22 | <Domenic> | No I guess we settled on noexport |
| 19:24 | <annevk> | https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8467 is the PR, but it's hard finding the relevant thread among all the resolved threads. |