| 09:44 | <zcorpan> | Hmm for https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/12782 I guess we could reduce the number of elements (and response size) by using Custom Highlight for syntax highlighting. Don't know if it would make much difference though |
| 11:59 | <farre> | I wrote a bit about tracing algorithms through web specs, using jjaschke's webspec-index and a Firefox extension I made. |
| 13:10 | <annevk> | zcorpan Noam Rosenthal: could you review https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12708 and https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12709 and the tests? |
| 13:40 | <annevk> | githubstatus.com is all green, yet many things seem to be falling over. |
| 13:41 | <annevk> | Ah there we go, now there's a red banner. |
| 14:03 | <jmdyck> | @farre: interesting |
| 14:13 | <Noam Rosenthal> | sure, will look at it when github is back up... |
| 14:53 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Also my stack of PRs (https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12583), which has already gone through a few review cycles, touches the adoption agency and I am a bit weary of conflicts... any way we could finish that and then apply this fix on top? |
| 15:29 | <Noam Rosenthal> | (specifically supporting the streaming sanitizer needed some extra work around AAA) |
| 15:33 | <annevk> | I guess that depends on what kind of changes you ended up making. GitHub is still a shit show so I guess I'll have to look at that tomorrow. |
| 15:34 | <Noam Rosenthal> | yea same for your AAA changes... it's likely not a big deal to rebase in either direction |
| 15:35 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Regardless of your change, the first couple of PRs in that stack were already reviewed by zcorpan so I'd like to know if you want to review them as well or proceed with that |
| 15:40 | <annevk> | I'd like to take a cursory look at least to see what ends up being changed. |
| 15:41 | <annevk> | Especially since I did a bunch of parser maintenance patches just before vacation. |
| 15:42 | <Noam Rosenthal> | sure, have at it! I've made sure to rebase on your before-OOO patches (IIRC it was about creating some nodes with the appropriate realm) |
| 15:48 | <annevk> | I'm not sure I understand "before-OOO", but yes, any node we create from now on needs to have a specified and ideally tested realm. Specifying it should be fairly automatic as all the creation algorithms now have a realm argument. |
| 15:53 | <Noam Rosenthal> | "before-OOO patches" "before the patches you've made before you were out of office" |
| 15:59 | <annevk> | Ah, doh. 😀 |
| 16:30 | <mfreed> | Hi all, just a friendly reminder to post any discussion topics for this Thursday's joint CSSWG/WHATWG/OpenUI task force meeting to the meeting agenda issue: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/12715 |
| 19:49 | <Noam Rosenthal> | Github seems to be mostly up |
| 21:55 | <smaug> | There must be a secret plan to hint to searchfox maintainers to get blink there 😛 |