06:38
<zcorpan>
Landing Noam's stack first seems easier wrt rebasing
08:08
<Noam Rosenthal>
Also I found some cases where I think this PR doesn't cover, added a comment
08:53
<annevk>
That's the wrong PR for that comment I think?
09:05
<annevk>
Also, that's technically not a case you can reach per spec because we don't have sync pagehide, but in practice we do have sync pagehide of course. I'll add a tentative test for that as well.
09:13
<Noam Rosenthal>
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12708#issuecomment-5319853865 ?
09:19
<Noam Rosenthal>
We should probably fix https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10194 or change the spec to reflect reality
09:35
<Noam Rosenthal>
or just have a global "chrome" property on window that does all kinds of things
10:28
<Noam Rosenthal>
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/12794
11:06
<annevk>
Yes we should. Note that 12709 covers AAA (and also covers the pagehide scenario now, I also updated WPT with a tentative test).
11:07
<Noam Rosenthal>
Great looks good now!
11:08
<Noam Rosenthal>
ah it's two different PRs, I thought the second one was the tests
11:30
<annevk>
Note that there's also a second test PR: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/61398
11:51
<Noam Rosenthal>
Thanks! https://chromium-review.git.corp.google.com/c/chromium/src/+/8261279 fixes some of this in blink
14:12
<annevk>
Noam Rosenthal: some more tests that require further spec changes (Chromium already gets these right): https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/62020
14:14
<Noam Rosenthal>
noice
14:32
<annevk>
I'm going to merge them into 12708 I think. And then tomorrow I'll try to review your four PRs.
14:34
<Noam Rosenthal>
hsivonen, zcorpan, are you OK with landing
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11818? It's been up for a month waiting for additional review (understood since folks were OOO etc, but maybe it's time to move forward...)
14:55
<Noam Rosenthal>
SG!
15:03
<Noam Rosenthal>
Once there are less PRs in flight I want to do a big parser cleanup, specifically around having a parser instance with the different things associated with it, and specifying the type of an "insertion location"
15:29
<Shannon Booth>
speaking of PRs, is there any chance #12127 and #12391 could please get a look? been open for a little and i think ready (maybe just queued in the backlog though)
16:17
<Noam Rosenthal>
I gave these an unofficial review, they look good