09:37
<krijnh>
Charl: you there?
09:57
<Charl>
krijnh: yes am here still, just not actively watching irc
09:57
<Charl>
krijnh: writing my application for google soc :)
10:16
<Lachy>
Hey Charl, you there?
10:29
<Charl>
Lachy: i am here right now, but will have to disappear for an hour or so, bbl
10:29
<Charl>
mail me please anyone, will read your mail as soon as i get back
10:30
<Charl>
or just use memoserve ;)
10:32
<Lachy>
nah, I was just gonna ask you why you weren't on MSN or Skype
13:19
<Charl>
hi BenWard :)
13:19
<BenWard>
Hi Charl :) I wondered if I'd stumble upon you in here. How're you doing?
13:20
<Charl>
very good thanks, yourself?
13:25
Charl
changes topic to 'WHATWG (HTML5) -- http://www.whatwg.org/ -- Logs: http://whatbot.charlvn.za.net/ or http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/ -- Please leave your sense of logic (and software patents) at the door, thanks! -- http://blog.whatwg.org/w3c-restarts-html-effort thanks to us!'
13:25
<Charl>
i seriously think somebody needs to get this channel on chanserv
13:25
<Charl>
so that we can have a proper entry message
13:25
<Charl>
instead of trying to squeeze everything into the title
13:25
<Charl>
this is channel title abuse :)
13:26
<BenWard>
Yeah… not too bad. I lost my job on Monday (company ran out of money) so I'm currently in the frantic freelancing limbo stage.
13:27
<Charl>
wow that sucks; i'm sure there'll be lots of work coming in, i hear the IT industry in many areas of europe is booming right now
13:27
<Charl>
i know here it is
13:27
<Charl>
we can hardly keep up, that's why i'm not active on many of the mailing lists right now :)
13:34
<krijnh>
Charl: freelancing doesn't suck :)
13:34
<Charl>
krijnh: not at all, only loosing your job :)
13:35
<Charl>
zcorpan: hi there
13:35
<zcorpan>
Charl: hi
13:36
<Charl>
zcorpan: sorry for being so silent from my side, i am desperately trying to get my google soc applications in
13:36
<Charl>
zcorpan: next week i'll be back to normal :)
13:37
<zcorpan>
no worries
14:25
<Dashiva>
So the html wg IRC channel is on yet another network. That puts my single-channel network count at... 6
14:37
<Lachy>
it would have been better if the HTMLWG just joined in here, since most (I think) of us in here are on the HTMLWG.
14:39
<Dashiva>
Or have the channel on this network, even if it was a different channel
14:40
<Lachy>
oh wow, the topic of this channel just keeps growing :-)
14:41
<Lachy>
krijnh, will you be importing the logs from whatbot into your irc-logs server? Then we can remove one of the URIs and redirect whatbot to your site
14:52
<Charl>
that would be better yes
14:53
<Charl>
i actually want to kill the java process running whatbot
14:53
<Charl>
it's just wasting bandwidth at the moment
14:53
<Charl>
i'll have to take down that server
14:53
<Charl>
so the previous logs will be lost
14:53
<Charl>
unless they can find a new home
14:53
<Charl>
they're just static files
14:53
<Charl>
so i'm sure i'll be able to upload them somewhere
14:54
<Charl>
it would of course be cooler if krijn can just import them all
14:54
<krijnh>
Yeah sure, I have nothing to do anyway ;)
14:56
<Charl>
you gotta be kidding :)
14:56
<krijnh>
I was ;)
14:56
<Charl>
thought as much :P
14:56
<krijnh>
Timezones are different though
14:56
<krijnh>
1 hour
14:56
<Charl>
oh yeah, SAST is UTC+02:00
14:57
<Charl>
holland is on UTC+01:00 i think
14:57
<krijnh>
Jup
14:57
<krijnh>
Although the page says timestamps are in GMT/BST
14:57
<Charl>
bah
14:57
<krijnh>
Is it a problem?
14:58
<krijnh>
Else I just copy 'n paste everything :)
14:58
<Charl>
i really wish we could just use UTC for absolutely everything
14:58
<Charl>
even adjust our clocks to that
14:58
<Charl>
would make things so much simpler
14:58
<Charl>
nah i don't think anybody is going to cry about 1 hour
14:58
<Charl>
i can zip all those logfiles and send them to you though if you want
14:58
<krijnh>
I want :)
14:59
<Charl>
cool i'll be back at work tomorrow then i'll struggle with my server a bit and get things organised
14:59
<Charl>
today is public holiday in ZA
14:59
<krijnh>
What are you doing here then?
14:59
<Charl>
bah i don't take holidays ;)
15:03
<krijnh>
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20061201
15:03
<krijnh>
:]
15:03
<krijnh>
Okay, that'll work
15:03
<krijnh>
Although now the fluffy colors are gone
15:04
<met_>
krijnh, nice can make link to particular comment
15:04
<krijnh>
Yes
15:04
<krijnh>
If more is needed, let me know
15:05
<krijnh>
Gotta add some filters for hiding joins/quits et cetera
15:06
<Charl>
and whatbot is officially dead
15:06
<Charl>
:)
15:06
<krijnh>
RIP
15:07
<krijnh>
I wonder what happens when my connection drops
15:09
<Charl>
i know what happened when mine did: whatbot got pwned :)
15:09
<krijnh>
Just a gap in the logs I suppose?
15:10
<Charl>
yeah exactly
15:50
<krijnh>
Anybody; is the filter usable like this; http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20070321 ?
15:51
<billmason>
wfm
15:53
<krijnh>
wfm? ;)
15:53
<billmason>
it Works For Me
15:53
<krijnh>
Just kidding :)
15:54
<zcorpan>
not <dialog>? ;)
15:55
<krijnh>
<dialog> needs <dt><dd>
15:55
<krijnh>
I told you I like <li> ;)
15:55
<zcorpan>
oh yep
15:56
<krijnh>
There, dialog
15:56
<krijnh>
:P
15:58
<krijnh>
Nah
15:58
<zcorpan>
it isn't possible to use <dialog> for a log like that, as currently defined
15:59
<zcorpan>
you can't have timestamps and you can't have things like [14:01] * Joins: Charl (n=charlvn⊙1211)
15:59
<krijnh>
Which aren't too interesting anyway
15:59
<krijnh>
Imho
16:00
<krijnh>
For a log
16:00
<zcorpan>
but /me is
16:00
<zcorpan>
how would you mark up those?
16:00
zcorpan
wonders
16:01
<krijnh>
<li class="status join"> I think
16:01
<krijnh>
In this case
16:01
<zcorpan>
the join/quit can just be stripped
16:24
<krijnh>
zcorpan: Done
16:27
<zcorpan>
krijnh: nice
16:28
<krijnh>
The code isn't, but heck
16:33
<Charl>
krijnh: the only people who have perfect code are utterly bored
16:34
<krijnh>
Nah
16:36
<zcorpan>
Lachy: s60webkit is not an exception to the rule that mobile browsers is tagsoup all the way (reading #html-wg logs)
16:48
<Hixie>
hm, using <li> inside dialog isn't a bad idea
16:48
<Hixie>
for non-dialog directions
16:49
<sayrer>
so I guess the HTML WG will start with http://esw.w3.org/topic/RequirementsDocument
16:49
sayrer
sighs
16:49
<annevk>
why not <p>?
16:49
<annevk>
sayrer, no, you can say how you want it to start
16:49
<sayrer>
well first I would have to join it
16:49
<annevk>
afaik DanC is just putting down some thoughts
16:49
<annevk>
sayrer, I suppose
16:49
<sayrer>
actually, I guess it doesn't matter
16:50
<annevk>
public-html does accept e-mails from people not in the group
16:50
<sayrer>
if it comes down to it, Mozilla gets one vote
16:50
<sayrer>
but I don't expect there will ever be a vote
16:51
<annevk>
i hope not
16:51
<sayrer>
is there any other reason to join?
16:51
<annevk>
at the moment it's just to state your opinion, pretty much...
16:51
<annevk>
I suspect that one MS joins there might be some more activity
16:51
<annevk>
such as how it's going to work...
16:52
<sayrer>
that should be "interesting"
16:52
<zcorpan>
annevk: i guess since <p> is allowed where block-level elements are allowed, having <dialog><p> would imply that <dialog> can take any block-level elements. <li> is only allowed in specific places, so authors wouldn't get the idea that anything is allowed in <dialog>
16:52
<annevk>
sayrer, you always love a good flamebait ;)
16:53
<sayrer>
yeah... trying to ignore it... :)
16:53
<annevk>
hah
16:53
<sayrer>
just make sure none of your proposals harm the ecology of the Document object ;)
17:16
<bewest>
I don't know how in the world Hixie has time to respond to so many emails and edit the spec
17:16
<annevk>
it's his job
17:16
<bewest>
hmm
17:16
<Hixie>
yeah
17:16
<Hixie>
it's my job :-)
17:17
<bewest>
even so...
17:20
met_
wonders if dialog can be used also for monolog like Hamlet's 8-)
18:02
<hendry>
i don't quite understand how "a final form medium" and "democratise web authoring" are related
18:02
<hendry>
esp. the last P.S. Argument
18:03
<hendry>
We have XML that can be adapted for different devices ... wtf
18:04
<hendry>
I don't think HTML content needs to be adapted for different devices
18:04
<hendry>
and XML isn't easier to edit than HTML is it?
18:04
<annevk>
depends on your god
18:05
<hendry>
annevk: what gods are there then?
18:05
<annevk>
you've got the Hixie god
18:05
<annevk>
and you've got Chris Lilley
18:05
<Hixie>
i'm no god.
18:06
<annevk>
oh
18:06
annevk
's world collapses
18:06
<Hixie>
i'm immortal, but i'm not a god. :-P
18:06
<gsnedders>
I thought it depended if you believed in markup gods or not?
18:08
<annevk>
gsnedders, that's trailing slashes in void elements in text/html documents
18:08
<annevk>
but sure
18:08
<hendry>
Hixie: what is your opinion on "Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?" and the questions raised within
18:08
<gsnedders>
only limited to that?
18:08
<Hixie>
hendry: i don't understand the question.
18:09
<hendry>
Dave Raggett's post on public-html.
18:09
<hendry>
I don't quite understand the questioning either
18:11
<tylerr>
Morning all. **waves**
18:11
<bewest>
hendry: seems pretty hypothetical to me
18:13
<Hixie>
yeah
18:13
<Hixie>
it wasn't really concrete enough for me to understand what he meant in practical terms
18:14
<bewest>
tantek would have a field day with that
18:14
<bewest>
hehe
18:16
<sayrer>
I think someone should post section 1 of HTML5 in bullet-point form, and claim that the requirements discussion is over
18:17
<Hixie>
heh
18:18
<Hixie>
you guys watching this #html-wg discussion?
18:18
<bewest>
oh
18:18
<bewest>
I forgot
18:18
<bewest>
irc.w3.org?
18:19
<Hixie>
irc.w3.org 6665 #html-wg
18:19
<bewest>
hmm do I need to authenticate?
18:19
<Hixie>
no
18:19
bewest
checks the port :-)
18:20
<bewest>
too many clients!
18:20
<Hixie>
heh
18:20
<bewest>
oh
18:20
<Hixie>
wait, too many clienths?
18:20
<bewest>
nm
18:20
<bewest>
my first analysis is always wrong
18:20
<bewest>
you'd think I wouldn't trust it after a while
18:27
<bewest>
gah that discussions seems like a waste of time
18:30
<zcorpan_>
bewest: indeed
18:31
<Hixie>
feel free to say so...
18:33
<zcorpan_>
i have quit html-wg
18:36
<bewest>
I wonder if this will typify the wg...
18:50
<hsivonen>
zcorpan_: did you leave the IRC channel or the whole WG?
18:59
<tylerr>
Hixie: I joined that room and no one was there. **pouts**
18:59
<zcorpan_>
oh, no the irc channel
18:59
<tylerr>
#html-wg
18:59
<tylerr>
doh
18:59
<tylerr>
wrong server
18:59
<tylerr>
:)
19:58
<annevk>
http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2007/03/yet-another/
20:00
<Hixie>
wow if that's not proof that it should be called matchAll() and matchSingle() i don't know what is
20:01
<Lachy>
awesome!
20:02
<Lachy>
that's like the DOM script I wrote nearly 2 years ago, which I really needed to update. Now I don't have to, I can use that :-)
20:05
<bewest>
whoah that looks nice
20:05
<bewest>
that will get me to switch from prototype.js
20:05
<sayrer>
lol
20:21
<Hixie>
it does look nice
20:27
<h3h>
Hixie: FWIW you probably want to update this page: http://code.google.com/webstats/
20:27
<h3h>
specifically, "We recommend Firefox 1.5."
20:27
<Hixie>
one day.
20:37
<tylerr>
I noticed that tutorials are needed for folks new to HTML, is the specification in a solid enough state to start writing some of these out?
20:38
<Hixie>
for some parts, e.g. <canvas>, yes.
20:39
<zcorpan_>
i've also been thinking about writing tuts
20:39
<met_>
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Canvas_tutorial ?
20:39
<zcorpan_>
both for people who already know html4/xhtml1, and for people completely new to html
20:40
<zcorpan_>
although that could be combined, so that people who know html4 can skip the first chapter
20:40
tylerr
nods.
20:40
<tylerr>
I was thinking the same.
20:44
<tylerr>
It's a bit too early for a book, but as more elements and such come forth, all these tutorials will make for excellent book material.
20:45
<tylerr>
Come forth meaning <canvas> et al.
20:46
<zcorpan_>
get implemented
20:46
<tylerr>
Right. My vocabulary is lacking today. **chuckles**
20:47
<tylerr>
I've got a large number of pages to fix today from an outsourced vendor, bleh!
20:59
<Hixie>
annevk: as far as i can tell, that guy's use case is dealt with using pattern="", not inputmode=""
20:59
<Hixie>
inputmode is more of a UI hint
21:01
<tylerr>
Here we go Hixie. http://futuremark.blogspot.com/
21:01
<tylerr>
Tutorials forthcoming.
21:01
tylerr
smiles.
21:01
<annevk>
makes sense
21:01
annevk
replied again with pattern=""
21:24
<zcorpan>
i wonder if babyruthcoming posted those threads manually
21:27
<zcorpan>
on the forum that is
21:41
<Hixie>
so there are two things that i've received feedback about that i'm thinking of adding to v1 of <video>
21:41
<Hixie>
one is an onended event
21:41
<Hixie>
the other is a way of adding cue marks
21:41
<Hixie>
cue marks being a way to say "at 21549ms, pause the video and send me an event telling me we're at cue 1"
21:42
<Hixie>
or "at 9292ms, send me a cue mark but continue playing the video"
21:43
<annevk>
are cue marks scripted?
21:43
<tylerr>
Those are good to have. I use those with QuickTime.
21:43
<annevk>
and why not use setTimeout?
21:44
<bewest>
are there guidelines for what successful tutorials look like?
21:44
<annevk>
bewest, 1000diggs
21:44
<hsivonen>
annevk: lol
21:44
<bewest>
nice
21:44
<Hixie>
how would setTimeout work? the video might be paused, seeked, etc.
21:44
<Hixie>
tylerr: yeah lots of people have spoken about them
21:44
<tylerr>
bewest: Looks like we're going to have to create 999 Digg accounts.
21:45
<annevk>
Hixie, oh, duh
21:45
<bewest>
or any alexa rank better than http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=http://w3schools.com/
21:45
<bewest>
yeah I was curious about setTimeout
21:45
<annevk>
Hixie, still leaves the first question
21:45
<Hixie>
yes
21:45
<tylerr>
bewest: I created http://futuremark.blogspot.com/, I could add you as a contributor.
21:45
<Hixie>
you would do it scripted, at least in v1
21:45
<annevk>
k
21:45
<Hixie>
unless we want to change the video stream somehow
21:45
<bewest>
tylerr: nah.... I'm all talk ;-)
21:45
<tylerr>
Ah right right. :)
21:46
<bewest>
tylerr: (aka too many projects already)
21:46
<bewest>
although I wonder if a planetwebtutorial would be in order
21:46
<annevk>
Hixie, did you specifically search for <t:video or <something:video as well?
21:47
<tylerr>
bewest: I've gotten myself rather swamped as well outside of work. HTML-WG soon, WaSP Street Team, Microformats, the list goes on. :)
21:47
<bewest>
yes
21:49
<tylerr>
On top of all that, I'm trying to turn myself into the company evangelist on web standards and accessibility.
21:49
<bewest>
of course
21:49
<tylerr>
Needless to say, my life is booked... for life. ;)
21:50
<Hixie>
annevk: <t:video
21:50
<bewest>
be careful... you'll find people coming to ask you questions you have no clue about
21:50
<Hixie>
annevk: you found any <other:video ?
21:50
<tylerr>
bewest: Naturally. I'm happy to direct them to #web or #html. ;)
21:50
<annevk>
Hixie, no, but given that t is bound to a namespace that should be possible...
21:50
<annevk>
although I guess most people would copy and paste
21:52
<Hixie>
i wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't possible, but yeah.
21:53
<bewest>
Hixie: I don't think either of those features are required for v1
21:53
<annevk>
it should be possible, IE also allows inlining of SVG that way (in combination with the Adobe plugin)
21:54
<bewest>
setTimeout handlers can check to make sure playback was continuous, as long as the syncing is sane when playback is continuous
21:54
<annevk>
setTimeout can't ensure that
21:54
<bewest>
oh
21:54
<bewest>
I asked you earlier and you said it was
21:54
<annevk>
the video could hit a AUTO-PAUSED for instance
21:54
<annevk>
well, I forgot a few variables
21:55
<bewest>
no, I mean when playback is continuous
21:55
<annevk>
although in theory I suppose you can take that all into account and develop your own cue marks...
21:55
<annevk>
but they might be inaccurate
21:55
<bewest>
if other things happen, your handler can sniff those out
21:55
<bewest>
eg, you can create an object that deschedules things when those things happen
21:55
<annevk>
otoh, you can just check video.position every 50ms
21:56
<bewest>
it's kind of a pain but it is possible
21:56
<bewest>
so if v1 is about enabling and not perfecting, then I say leave it all out
22:03
annevk
would just concur
22:03
<annevk>
it's unlikely we update our experimental <video> implementation soonish anyway I think
22:21
annevk
wondered for a moment if MegaZone is a spammer
22:21
<Lachy_>
who's MegaZone?
22:21
<tylerr>
MegaZone?
22:21
<Lachy_>
on the blog, wiki or forum?
22:21
<annevk>
the list
22:21
<tylerr>
Ah nevermind, just got the e-mail. :)
22:21
<annevk>
but it appears it's for real
22:21
<zcorpan>
wow, didn't know about ctrl+drag in tables in firefox
22:22
<Lachy_>
oh, me too :-)
22:23
<tylerr>
What the... that is an odd e-mail from MegaZone.
22:23
<tylerr>
And my mail filter doesn't work on him.
22:24
<annevk>
i meant that I don't think he's spamming
22:24
tylerr
nods
22:24
<tylerr>
I'm just confused as to why I got mail that was not sent to the list.
22:25
<Lachy_>
it was probably BCC'd for some reason
22:26
tylerr
nods. That's what I figure.
22:26
<Lachy_>
I wonder why the Sender is 'whatwg-bounces⊙wo'. Is that from the moderation queue or something?
22:28
<annevk>
there shouldn't be such a thing
22:28
<annevk>
i mean, Hixie said he wouldn't pay attention to it
22:30
annevk
-> bed
22:31
<annevk>
g'night
22:32
<hasather>
good night annevk
22:44
<tylerr>
What do you all think of "one-a-days" as a way to introduce the elements of HTML5 to new and current web developers? Basically each day present a new blog entry covering a single element, with an overview/breakdown and example section.
22:47
<Lachy_>
tylerr: are you planning to write some articles like that?
22:47
<tylerr>
Aye Lachy_. I've gone and set up a blog already over at Blogger.
22:47
<Lachy_>
URI?
22:48
<tylerr>
http://futuremark.blogspot.com/
22:48
<tylerr>
Nothing as of yet. Just set it up an hour or so ago. :)
22:48
<Lachy_>
articles like that might be good to have on blog.whatwg.org
22:49
<zcorpan>
i guess it makes more sense to focus on features rather than elements, as some elements are rather boring and others don't do anything without combination of other elements, and some features don't have elements at all, etc
22:49
<zcorpan>
and some elements are overloaded, e.g. <input>
22:49
tylerr
nods.
22:50
<tylerr>
Something to think about.
22:51
<zcorpan>
what i had in mind wrt writing a tut was to have one big tutorial that is updated as the spec envolves... so not quite blog-like
22:51
<tylerr>
That's an open blog right lachy_?
22:51
<tylerr>
Ah so like a wikitorial?
22:52
<zcorpan>
yeah
22:52
<tylerr>
That's a nifty idea.
22:52
<Lachy_>
tylerr: yes, anyone can register and post to that blog
22:52
<tylerr>
Lovely. Perhaps then I'll leave Futuremark to future endeavors. ;)
22:53
<tylerr>
And focus on doing the one-a-days on the blog.whatwg.com
22:53
<tylerr>
Err
22:53
<tylerr>
.org
22:53
<Lachy_>
if you want to start a tutorial, set it up on wiki.whatwg.org
22:53
<Lachy_>
in fact, that would be an interesting community project for all those people who write to me asking how they can help
22:54
<zcorpan>
Lachy_: yeah that's what i thought
22:55
<tylerr>
Lachy_: That would address the "Write tutorials for new authors and for authors moving to HTML5." and "Write articles about HTML5 on the blog" quite nicely.
22:55
<zcorpan>
the tutorial should be of two major parts, i think; one without any new features in html5 (for beginners) and one with only new features in html5 (for people who know html4)
22:56
<Lachy_>
it should be one tutorial. It should just progress from beginner to advanced
22:56
<tylerr>
So a "List.4.01 -> List.5?" type of deal?
22:58
<tylerr>
Ah nevermind. I understand what you mean.
22:58
Lachy_
goes to set up /wiki/HTML5_Tutorial
22:59
<Lachy_>
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/HTML5_Tutorial
23:00
<bewest>
why should there be one?
23:00
<Lachy_>
why not?
23:00
<bewest>
not everyone writes or reads the same way
23:00
<zcorpan>
so?
23:01
<Lachy_>
this doesn't have to be the only tutorial, but there should be at least one somewhere
23:01
<bewest>
/wiki/tutorials/...
23:01
<Lachy_>
people need to learn HTML5
23:01
bewest
pipes down
23:01
<bewest>
yeah, looks good
23:02
<zcorpan>
tutorials will be written regardless, so we should set up a place where people can contribute and we can fix their misinformation ;)
23:02
<bewest>
yeah
23:02
<bewest>
good idea
23:02
<Lachy_>
bewest: I thought about setting up Category:Tutorial for that, but then there only needs to be one on this wiki. We could set up a /Tutorials page that just catalogues all known tutorials on the web
23:03
<zcorpan>
or rather, all *good* tutorials on the web :)
23:03
<Lachy_>
We can list the bad ones too in the section called "Bad Tutorials" :-)
23:04
<bewest>
yeah
23:04
<bewest>
hehehe
23:04
<zcorpan>
oh yep, that's ok :)
23:04
<Lachy_>
w3schools would go in there ;-)
23:04
<bewest>
that's funny
23:04
<bewest>
yes
23:04
<bewest>
hehe
23:04
<bewest>
a planet style site would be interesting
23:04
<bewest>
provide search juice
23:04
<tylerr>
Lachy_: How might you categorize these one-a-days I'll be doing soon? Would they fall under Category:Element?
23:05
<Lachy_>
I thought they were blog entries, not wiki pages?
23:05
<tylerr>
Lachy_: Ah sorry, yes. That's what I mean. Would they fall under the already created category of element?
23:05
<tylerr>
Or should there be a custom category for them?
23:06
<Lachy_>
oh, you mean http://blog.whatwg.org/category/elements/ ?
23:06
<tylerr>
bewest: Something akin to a zen garden?
23:06
<tylerr>
Lachy_: Aye.
23:06
<bewest>
something akin to planetrdf or planetcherrypy but for web authoring tutorials
23:06
<tylerr>
Ahh
23:07
<Lachy_>
You can select multiple categories for each article, and you can create a new one if you like. (if you need admin privilages to do that, just ask me to set it up)
23:07
<tylerr>
Perfect Lachy_, will do. I'll flesh out an article schedule tomorrow.
23:07
<tylerr>
I'd do it tonight but guests have decided to stay the evening.
23:08
<zcorpan>
tylerr: you could perhaps start with these features http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Implementations_in_Web_browsers
23:08
<tylerr>
zcorpan: Excellent! That would be lovely.
23:09
<tylerr>
Then move on to the others.
23:09
<tylerr>
Question, is this an up-to-date site?
23:09
<tylerr>
http://simon.html5.org/html5-elements
23:11
<tylerr>
If so, I've got 87 days of articles.
23:11
tylerr
smiles.
23:12
<Lachy_>
tylerr: that's why it's best to focus on features, rather than elements. Also, not all features have elements. Some are APIs, class names, rel, etc.
23:12
<zcorpan>
tylerr: it should be up to date. if you find anything that's incorrect please let me know :)
23:12
<tylerr>
Ah that's yours zcorpan, lovely!
23:13
<Lachy_>
and some elements might need more than one article. e.g. all the <input type="..."> and other form contorls
23:13
<tylerr>
Lachy_: And a good point.
23:13
<tylerr>
I'll model it then on features as you suggest.
23:14
<tylerr>
Lists, tables, forms, quotes, etc.
23:16
<tylerr>
Right then.
23:19
<tylerr>
Would it be of benefit to have a section of the wiki that lists contributors/volunteers and what they're working on?
23:25
<Lachy_>
tylerr: you could list the project on the /What_you_can_do page, and then set up another page explaining how people can help out
23:25
<Lachy_>
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/What_you_can_do
23:26
<tylerr>
Right right, so as a section below the initial list.
23:27
<Lachy_>
do it however you like. It's your project!
23:27
tylerr
chuckles.
23:28
<tylerr>
Right then.
23:30
<tylerr>
Well folks, thanks for the good discussion today, I'm off till tomorrow.
23:30
<zcorpan_>
cya
23:30
<Lachy_>
cya later
23:58
<othermaciej>
Hixie: media stuff sent
23:59
<Hixie>
sweet