10:06
<hsivonen>
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/XGR-emotion-20070710/
10:15
<mpt>
:-D
10:18
<mpt>
or should I say <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><eml><emma:interpretation meaning="hilarious">:-D</emma:interpretation></eml>
10:52
<virtuelv>
hsivonen: yuck
10:53
<virtuelv>
"Look at the sky. There is <emphasislevel="strong">not a single </emphasis> cloud. "
14:29
<gsnedders>
where does the convention of preceding attributes with @ and surrounding element names with | come from?
14:38
<Philip`>
I've always assumed the @ comes via XPath
14:42
<BenWard>
The @ is definitely an XPath-ism.
14:47
<gsnedders>
That's what I assumed,
14:47
<gsnedders>
But the vertical bar, I have little idea.
14:55
<zcorpan_>
the vertical bar is a convention for code in general, i think
20:40
<gsnedders>
what does SCS stand for in the spec?
20:41
<Philip`>
Self-contained section, I think
20:41
<gsnedders>
ah
21:35
<gsnedders>
anyone know of any mail clients that can cope with 100k+ locally stored emails without being overly slow?
21:43
<jgraham>
gsnedders: I have about 20k in Thunderbird using IMAP
21:44
<jgraham>
(actually it's more than 20k but less than 100k)
21:46
<gsnedders>
I had no issues with Mail.app till around 100k, so how something copes with 20k is thy-irrelevant
21:46
<jgraham>
Fair enough
22:02
<Hixie>
zcorpan: yt?
22:03
<Hixie>
zcorpan: re the [[Get]] stuff, the spec is a mess regarding that, it's a known issue, i'm waiting for the ES4 DOM Binding spec to be done before fixing it
22:03
<Hixie>
also note that unless you warn me about them i'm likely to miss e-mails you send to public-html
22:08
<zcorpan>
Hixie: ok
22:09
<zcorpan>
Hixie: i think there might be a wiki page that lists all detailed reviews or something
22:14
<hsivonen>
Hixie: zcorpan and I have easily seachable subject lines
22:14
<hsivonen>
searchable even
22:16
<Hixie>
k
22:16
<zcorpan>
"review of"
22:17
<Hixie>
http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/advanced_search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=review+of&hdr-2-name=from&hdr-2-query=&hdr-3-name=message-id&hdr-3-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-html&resultsperpage=100&sortby=date-asc
22:17
<Hixie>
that doesn't really work well
22:18
<zcorpan>
ok -- http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/advanced_search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=%22detailed+review%22&hdr-2-name=from&hdr-2-query=&hdr-3-name=message-id&hdr-3-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-html&resultsperpage=100&sortby=date-asc
22:19
<hsivonen>
Hixie: http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/advanced_search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=%28detailed+review+of&hdr-2-name=from&hdr-2-query=&hdr-3-name=message-id&hdr-3-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-html&resultsperpage=100&sortby=date-asc
22:19
<Hixie>
that's still going to end up catching a lot of whining e-mail replies to your comments :-)
22:20
<zcorpan>
haven't seen whining replies to detailed reviews
22:20
jgraham
has noticed far fewer replies to messages with substantial review comments
22:20
hsivonen
doesn't consider heycam, liorean or mjs whining
22:20
<Hixie>
none yet
22:20
<hsivonen>
jgraham is right
22:21
<Hixie>
but i'm sure by 9 months from now when i finally get to public-html mail, there'll've been some
22:31
<Hixie>
hsivonen: re foster parenting of spaces, known issue; i plan to address it by having a flag which triggers once you start foster parenting, after which spaces get foster parented
22:35
<zcorpan>
Hixie: comments too?
22:36
<hsivonen>
Hixie: so you are taking the Gecko route instead of the WebKit trunk route?
22:37
<Hixie>
zcorpan: dunno
22:37
<hsivonen>
Hixie: Gecko foster parents them, too.
22:37
<Hixie>
hsivonen: i don't know which is which, but if gecko does what i described and not webkit, then yes, though that is mostly accidental
22:37
<Hixie>
i haven't looked at it in detail
22:37
<hsivonen>
Hixie: WebKit trunk does what I said on the list
22:38
<Hixie>
btw forget what i said about not seeing the comments to public-html
22:38
<Hixie>
turns out i'm not missing them
22:38
<Hixie>
i seem to have no trouble recognising your e-mails from the flood of nonsense
22:38
<Hixie>
that goes for zcorpan's and gsnedders' e-mails too
22:38
<hsivonen>
:-)
22:45
<gsnedders>
yay! mine aren't nonsense!
22:45
<gsnedders>
:)