08:55
<krijnh>
hsivonen: yt?
08:56
<hsivonen>
krijnh: yes
08:57
<krijnh>
Perhaps my server is misconfigured
08:57
<krijnh>
Wrt your accept header
08:57
<krijnh>
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/html5/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fkrijnhoetmer.nl%2Fstuff%2Ftests%2Ftable-caption-margin
08:57
<krijnh>
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/html5/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fkrijnhoetmer.nl%2Fstuff%2Ftests%2Ftable-caption-margin.html works
08:58
<hsivonen>
krijnh: in that case, the accept header should have a/x+x, a/x and t/h in it
08:58
<hsivonen>
preferring a/x+x
08:58
<krijnh>
Hmm, then why does Apache send a 406 header
08:59
<hsivonen>
of course, it is possible that I have a bug and the validator sends something else
09:02
<krijnh>
Or a bug in Apache
09:02
<hsivonen>
krijnh: found it
09:03
<krijnh>
Fixable?
09:03
<hsivonen>
krijnh: your apache thinks the type is application/x-httpd-php and that's not on my Accept list
09:03
<krijnh>
Ah
09:03
<krijnh>
.html does get parsed by php
09:04
<krijnh>
Any idea how I can fix that?
09:05
<hsivonen>
krijnh: I'm not sure, but I think the way you are associating files with an Apache handler is the legacy (content-type) way. I would guess that using the new handler association wouldn't confuse multiviews
09:06
<hsivonen>
that is, AddHandler instead of AddType might fix it
09:06
<hsivonen>
for the php association
09:06
<krijnh>
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .html is what I use, yeah
09:06
<krijnh>
I'll look it up, thanks
09:07
<krijnh>
I wonder if that works for Apache 1.3 as well
09:08
<hsivonen>
I don't know
09:12
<krijnh>
:p that doesn't really work
09:20
<krijnh>
Yay, fixed
09:32
<hsivonen>
krijnh: what worked?
09:32
<krijnh>
hsivonen: The ugly approach
09:33
<krijnh>
Just made a dir with an index.html in it
09:33
<krijnh>
Almost the same :)
09:33
<krijnh>
This can't be fixed for Apache 1.3 with the AddHandler way
11:15
<hendry>
what's going on with whatwg and a storage layer, ala google gears
14:47
<zcorpan_>
hsivonen: http://www.rightwebpage.com/content/view/35/42/ "2) HTML Validation against W3C DTDs and WHATWG (X)HTML5 pre-release schemas;"
14:57
<met_>
last 2 comments http://blog.whatwg.org/wsg-html5-presentation#comment-6388 http://blog.whatwg.org/proposing-uri-templates-for-webforms-20#comment-6387 content llooks in topic, but home-URL looks it's spam
15:02
<zcorpan_>
then it's spam
21:50
<hsivonen>
https://garage.maemo.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=1171
22:11
<jgraham>
hsivonen: I loose track but have Nokia not developed or shipped browsers based on all of Gecko and Presto and Webkit at various times?
22:12
<bewest>
the 770 ships with opera
22:12
<bewest>
I don't know the history of maemo previous to the 770
22:12
<bewest>
is this mozilla based browser something other than minimo?
22:13
<bewest>
must be... I suppose if it was minimo they would have said so
22:14
<hsivonen>
jgraham: yes.