00:08
<annevk>
awesomeness, thanks Øistein Unicode people are looking into defining what I want
00:09
<annevk>
thanks to*
00:09
<jmb>
that is, indeed, cool
00:09
<Hixie>
yeah, mark is one of my colleagues here at google
00:10
<Hixie>
he's good people
00:10
<annevk>
heh
00:10
<annevk>
small world et all
00:12
<Hixie>
did the htmlwg ever reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2004Aug/0011.html ?
00:12
Hixie
looks at xhtml2 to see what solution they came up with for quotes
00:12
<annevk>
they have <quote>
00:13
<annevk>
that doesn't have quotes
00:13
<Hixie>
actually looks like they went back to having <q>
00:13
Hixie
looks up its definition
00:13
<annevk>
interesting
00:13
<Hixie>
...but the definition still has all the problems bjoern listed
00:13
<Hixie>
lovely
00:14
<Hixie>
ok so that's a waste of time...
00:15
<annevk>
btw, your suggestion about using some advanced form of generated content sounds like over engineering to me as <q> is not that much used anyway
00:28
<Hixie>
wow, <q> is used more than <dfn> and <del> and <ins>
00:28
<Hixie>
not as often as <ilayer>, <bgsound>, and <blink>, but...
00:29
<Philip`>
From 8K pages I saw 2 q, 8 dfn, 3 del, 2 ins
00:29
<Philip`>
which isn't really enough to detect a significant difference
00:30
<Hixie>
you see four times more pages that use <dfn> than <q> and you don't think it's enough to detect a difference?
00:30
<Philip`>
I see six more pages that use the dfn than q, and I don't think that's significant :-)
00:30
<Hixie>
oh i guess root-8k is ~90
00:30
<jmb>
that rather depends on how well your sample set maps to the global set :)
00:31
<Philip`>
In 130K pages, I see 59 q and 158 dfn
00:31
<Philip`>
which is a significant difference
00:31
<Hixie>
well back in 2007 i saw, out of ~3bn files, about 4.1 million <blink>, and about 3.9 million <q>, and about 3.3 million <dfn>.
00:32
<Philip`>
I see 807 blink
00:32
<Hixie>
wow so you see an order of magnitude difference where i see basically nothing
00:32
<Hixie>
not sure what that tells us
00:32
<Hixie>
but it tells us something!
00:34
<jmb>
dmoz.org likes pages that use blink? :)
00:35
<Philip`>
I have no idea if blink has the same huge cultural differences as marquee
00:36
<Philip`>
(30% of .cn sites in dmoz.org use marquee, vs 3% of all sites)
00:56
Philip`
finds it ironic that an email reply on unicore⊙uo causes "Øistein" to display as "�istein"
02:11
<Lachy>
Hixie, what is the real benefit of using <q> if quotation marks have to be provided manually?
04:01
<Hixie>
Lachy: let's you do things like pullquotes
08:58
<Hixie>
an unbelievable number of people apparently read through that entire 3000 line e-mail
10:02
<annevk>
Hixie, the nested quote example misses an end tag
10:07
<Hixie>
thanks fixed
14:30
<gsnedders>
jgraham: was it you who had implemented the outliner?
16:10
jgraham
wonders if gsnedders reads the logs
16:16
<jgraham>
gsnedders: Yes
16:17
<gsnedders>
jgraham: can I coerce my way into getting the code?
16:18
<jgraham>
I have no idea. But there's no need because you can simply download it from t' internet
16:20
<gsnedders>
jgraham: from where?
16:20
jgraham
is just checking it is actually on the internet
16:22
<jgraham>
Hmm. Maybe it isn't on the internet yet.
16:22
jgraham
goes to fix that
16:22
<gsnedders>
then can I coerce my way to it? :P
16:55
<jgraham>
gsnedders: Since I'm being so slow doing this properly: http://james.html5.org/temp/outline/
16:56
<jgraham>
(the code is kinda sucky btw)
16:56
<gsnedders>
jgraham: the .py gives me 500
16:57
<jgraham>
Can't you do Save to Disk?
16:57
<gsnedders>
jgraham: that'll just save the 500 result
16:58
<jgraham>
Hmm. That would make sense I suppose
16:58
<gsnedders>
:)
17:00
gsnedders
can just wait for it to be done properly, FWIW, jgraham
17:43
<jgraham>
gsnedders: Not done properly (I got distracted) but you should be able to download it now
17:44
<gsnedders>
yay! I can has get it!
21:31
<Hixie>
ok, i've dealt with all the feedback from 2004...
21:32
<gsnedders>
Hixie: when do you think 2005 will be done?
21:32
<Hixie>
no idea
21:36
Philip`
changes his system clock back four years and sends an email
21:40
jgraham
wonders whether he should post anything to the alt thread
21:40
gsnedders
has so far resisted
21:40
<Philip`>
Depends on whether you have something to say that hasn't been said before in the three million prior threads :-)
21:41
<gsnedders>
@alt is evil! Kill it!
21:42
<Philip`>
Get rid of <img alt> and add <link rel="alternate accessible"> to solve the accessibility use case
21:43
<gsnedders>
where <img> is the content of the <link> element
21:44
<jgraham>
Philip`: I don't know if I'm saying anything new or not anymore. Or whether it doesn't matter because no one remembers what anyone else has said anyway
21:44
jgraham
leaves the email half written instead
21:51
<bzed>
jgraham: sorry to bother you again, but wthat's the lxml status? :)
21:53
<jgraham>
bzed: lxml should work now. There are four tests in the liberal xml parser that fail on my system and which need to be sorted out but everything else seems to be OK
21:54
jgraham
needs to send an email about that as well
21:54
<bzed>
cool
21:55
<bzed>
are there any plans for a new (beta...alpha... whatever) release? if somehow possible I'd like to get a proper, well working release into debian
21:56
<gsnedders>
(FWIW, I should be able to do some work on html5lib if needed end of May after all my exams (apart from Computing) are over)
21:57
<gsnedders>
(Computing doesn't count. I'll get the highest band of A anyway :P)
21:57
<gsnedders>
</arrogance>
22:00
<jgraham>
bzed: Yeah, we'll do a release sometime after the last few tests pass
22:01
jgraham
grumbles about code.google.com being slow
22:01
<bzed>
any idea when that will be?
22:01
<jgraham>
bzed: "When it's ready" :-p (seriously, it should be very soon)
22:02
<bzed>
I'm not sure when the release managers will go on with the freeze of lenny
22:02
<bzed>
as soonb as it's frozen, it would be hard to get a big patch/new version in, so tha tshould happen before
22:03
<jgraham>
bzed: I can make a release branch for you now if it will help
22:04
<jgraham>
Then you could just pull small fixes
22:05
<bzed>
jgraham: not necessary now, but I'll ping you if that would be needed
22:06
<bzed>
jgraham: some of the release managers are working at the same company then I do, so I usually know if things will happen
22:07
<jgraham>
bzed: OK. I will get the ball rolling on the release a bit this evening
22:08
<bzed>
jgraham: thanks a lot
22:12
<jgraham>
np
22:13
<Hixie>
anyone here play brawl?
22:14
<annevk>
if you mean http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl not available yet...
22:14
<Hixie>
i've played with people in norway
22:14
<Hixie>
how is it not available yet?
22:16
<annevk>
hmm, maybe I missed something
22:29
<jgraham>
Gah, you're just baiting the Wii-less ;)
22:30
<Pavlov>
Hixie: it is out
22:31
<Pavlov>
oh
22:31
<Pavlov>
nm
22:33
<Hixie>
yeah, i'm trying to find peopel to play with me :-)
22:33
<Pavlov>
ah
22:33
<Pavlov>
i've been meaning to pick it up
23:27
<Lachy>
I haven't seen any new, significant arguments presented in the alt attribute thread. Resonding to it would likely only result in repeating what I have already said.