01:04
<gsnedders>
krijnh: _sometimes_.
01:22
<annevk2>
especially when I'm right
01:24
<annevk2>
http://annevankesteren.nl/2008/09/re-two-thousand-twenty-two#comment-6629
01:25
<annevk2>
it's funny in a way
01:38
<gsnedders>
Hixie bringing up Godwin's Law?
04:57
<shepazu>
annevk2: where did I post to a member-only thread?
04:59
<shepazu>
er, point to a post on a member-only thread, I mean
05:01
<shepazu>
what the heck? why did Hyatt post that to the old SVG list?
05:01
<shepazu>
maybe he didn't know we work in public now
09:19
<Hixie>
you know, a remarkable number of new features in html5 have been implemented in at least one browser
09:19
<Hixie>
we're further along than i thought
09:36
<hsivonen>
Hixie: and parsing is implemented outside browsers as is the outline algorithm
09:37
<hsivonen>
Hixie: is there anything implementing behavior triggered on <aside>?
09:40
<Hixie>
as far as i know the main things missing any implementations at all are <datagrid> and all the various semantic elements
09:40
<Hixie>
including <aside>
09:46
<othermaciej>
parsing algorithm is not implemented in any browser
10:35
<hsivonen>
I see Transformations, Transitions and Animations as medium priority on CSS WG's list. is the CSS WG working on them after all? http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work
10:43
<Hixie>
there's a weird bug in mac os x software update
10:44
<Hixie>
it's reboot-time progress bar's range is limited to 0..20%
10:44
<Hixie>
its
10:44
<Hixie>
also why on earth does updating quicktime and itunes require a restart
11:09
<zcorpan>
hsivonen: why doesn't the svg schema have holes for inkscape and rdf?
11:12
<zcorpan>
hsivonen: or if it's intentional, why does the svg preset have the "unchecked" pseudo-schema?
11:18
<hsivonen>
zcorpan: no good reason. perhaps the standalone schema should have the same holes
11:23
zcorpan
looks at http://validator.nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fwebkit.org%2Fblog-files%2Fanimation-demo.svg&showsource=yes
11:24
zcorpan
notes that the results of the same svg embedded in xhtml with the xhtml5+svg schema are more useful
12:00
<annevk2>
heh, several people have been trying to figure out whether html5.org has a forum
12:01
<annevk2>
visits have gone up to ~20000 a day despite robots being blocked by robots.txt
12:04
<svl>
annevk2: unlikely that it's been "people" trying to find that out. There's several spambots which try visiting the common directories for frequently used forum software like phpbb
12:04
<annevk2>
hmm, it doesn't seem entirely reliable, ~200000 requests from MSIE/5
12:04
<annevk2>
where other browsers have more in the order of ~5000
12:05
<annevk2>
so probably some bot is still hitting it hard
12:05
<hsivonen>
what's a good apt-gettable apache log analysis package these days?
12:07
<annevk2>
but there's not a single host with ~200000 requests, probably uses several IPs or so... hmm
12:09
<svl>
annevk2: if it's the same, it's all botnets.
12:10
<annevk2>
I suspect it being the same, there's far too much MSIE/5 in there
12:10
<annevk2>
I don't really have much interest in investigating this further though as there's nothing to spam on html5.org and there's no load problem either
15:28
<gsnedders>
I can't quite decide whether it's going to rain and through that whether to go out or not. Meh.
17:06
<takkaria>
oh, the TAG f2f minutes are interestinf
17:07
<takkaria>
or rather, the agenda
17:07
<takkaria>
apparently if you're embedding HTML fragments in Atom in CDATA sections, you might as well be embedding PostScript or "something equally opaque"
17:14
<billyjackass>
takkaria: you sure the "equally opaque" part wasn't referring to the actually f2f attendees themselves?
17:16
<takkaria>
heh
23:02
<jruderman>
Hixie: do you still want https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180622 ?
23:03
<Hixie>
When the alt="" attribute is missing, yes
23:03
<Hixie>
not otherwise