| 19:54 | <Lachy> | Hixie, yt? |
| 20:00 | <Lachy> | Hixie, if you allow some unescaped ampersands in URLs, that's going to make some complicated conformance requirements. To be useful for catching omitted semicolons, you would still have to make things like ?foo©=1§=2 non-conforming because they're entities |
| 20:25 | <Philip`> | Hixie: http://hixie.ch/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=hixie.ch says "Gone ... If you wish to report this problem (please do!) then you may <a href="http://hixie.ch/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=hixie.ch">report a bug using bugzilla</a>" |
| 20:28 | <gsnedders> | Well, report a bug, Philip`! |
| 20:28 | <gsnedders> | In Bugzilla, that is |
| 20:31 | <Philip`> | gsnedders: I've been doing that for the past half an hour, but then I realised I wasn't getting anywhere so I thought I'd try IRC too |
| 20:47 | <sicking> | Hixie, currently? Because cookie-changes happen on the same thread as JS execution |
| 20:47 | <sicking> | Hixie, until recent releases of chrome and IE8 that is |
| 21:31 | <sicking> | olliej, you pinged |
| 21:32 | <olliej> | sicking: i was going to harangue you about importscripts :D |
| 21:32 | <gsnedders> | Hixie: http://twitter.com/ringmaster/status/1302295097 |
| 21:32 | <sicking> | olliej, harangue away |
| 21:32 | <sicking> | olliej, just saw your comment. I would not implement what we do |
| 21:33 | <sicking> | olliej, I don't think anyone has brought up an argument for doing the syntax checking part |
| 21:33 | <olliej> | sicking: that was the conclusion i had come to |
| 21:33 | <sicking> | olliej, cool. I'm gonna try to convince bent that what the spec says is the right thing to do :) |
| 21:37 | <olliej> | sicking: righto |