00:33
<sayrer>
"Mozilla screws another loyal customer"
00:33
<sayrer>
that's rich
00:33
<gavin_>
context?
00:34
<sayrer>
http://delicious.com/wearehugh
00:36
<sayrer>
I like mkaply's comment too
00:36
<sayrer>
"Can someone point me to one of these supposed malware Firefox Community Editions?"
00:36
<sayrer>
yes, supposed.
00:39
<sayrer>
I like that neither of them care how dishonest their arguments are
00:39
<sayrer>
or how hypocritical
00:39
<sayrer>
they just want to win
11:58
<Philip`>
http://ocoins.info/ - <span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.issn=1045-4438"></span> - that doesn't look overwhelmingly elegant
12:04
<annevk2>
I like their 'Why "Z3988"?'
12:04
<annevk2>
It basically explains they do not read specs and just figure out what works from browsers.
12:05
<annevk2>
(CSS can work with punctation in class names, you just need to escape it properly.)
12:14
<Dashiva>
Why did they drop the -2004 though?
12:35
<gsnedders>
Dashiva: Because versioning in the root of evil
12:42
<Dashiva>
They didn't drop the versioning, though
12:42
<Dashiva>
They just moved it from the class name to elsewhere
12:46
<gsnedders>
Well it's hardly as if I read that document.
15:30
<gsnedders>
Hixie: What's the point in the 30% margin at the bottom of body?
15:41
<Philip`>
gsnedders: So that links to #foo will display foo at the top of the screen, even if that content is near the bottom of the page
15:42
<gsnedders>
But the final anchors are quite a way up!
19:30
<Hixie>
gsnedders: multipage version
19:30
<gsnedders>
Ah, that makes a bit more sense.
21:00
<annevk2>
http://twitter.com/aral/status/1452067278
21:37
<Philip`>
Calling it "HTML5" seemed more arrogant
21:37
<gsnedders>
Should it have been 2.0
21:37
<gsnedders>
*?
21:41
<Niictar24>
Maybe he thought the 1.0 suggested that this was the first attempt at "web applications" and anything before it didn't count?
21:42
<webben>
Flash 5 ;)