00:00
<Midler>
ok
00:03
<Philip`>
It'd seem silly five years from now when the new UI paradigm doesn't have the concept of tabs
00:03
<Midler>
ye, i know
00:04
<Midler>
All browsers nowadays has tabs
00:04
<Midler>
However, u might want for some reason (that i cant get right now), open a page in a new window
00:05
<Midler>
Example, instead of javascript window.open
00:05
<Philip`>
Like target="_blank"?
00:05
<Midler>
yes
00:05
<Midler>
Somethimes _blank
00:05
<Midler>
and (most of the thime) _tab
00:06
<Midler>
but know when i think of it, target seems useless
00:06
<Philip`>
I think Opera already loads target=_blank into a new tab by default
00:06
<Midler>
most browser does by default
00:06
<Midler>
but thats the thing
00:07
<Midler>
If you by some reason dont want to open a page up in a new tab, then what?
00:07
<Midler>
I cant come to think of any of these moments
00:07
<Midler>
right now*
00:09
Philip`
knows this has been discussed before but can't remember the relevant arguments, and so goes to bed instead :-)
00:10
<Midler>
Hm, well
00:10
<Midler>
google had some javascript examples somewhere
00:10
<othermaciej>
hi everyone
00:10
<Midler>
And one of the example was about moving a ball thru different windows
00:11
<Midler>
Cant remember the page
00:12
<Midler>
Multiple windows interacting with each other*
00:14
<Philip`>
http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/browser-ball/ ?
00:15
<Midler>
jup
00:15
<Midler>
thats the one
00:16
<Dashiva>
Midler: The user has the choice to open in window and tab, that's all you need
00:36
<Midler>
Is there anyone here that have some time to spend and listen to my stupid questions =)
00:36
<Midler>
?
00:37
<annevk2>
just write them down
00:37
<annevk2>
stuff is logged, maybe some day you'll get a reply :)
00:38
<Midler>
^^
00:38
<Midler>
Well, for example
00:38
<Midler>
typing <!-- --> all the time to write a comment is quite...well
00:38
Midler
is a lazy guy
00:39
<Midler>
And second of all (i dont know if its within the standardisation)
00:39
<Midler>
But favicon
00:39
<Midler>
I would like to be able to have favicons in .png and .svg
00:39
<Midler>
And in bigger size for a reason
00:40
<Midler>
There is ppl that for example saves the homepage as a link on their desktop
00:40
<Midler>
And usually it will be desplayed with the broswer loggo
00:40
<annevk2>
you can do that by using the sizes attribute on <link>
00:41
<Midler>
well, but right now favicon has a maxsize doesnt it?
00:42
<Midler>
And also, as more stuffs is getting on the web. A link with the page logos instead of browser logo could be something to consider, but that means bigger logos
01:01
<Midler>
hmm
01:02
<Midler>
target is also implemented in area
01:04
<Midler>
If you take the example from w3c
01:04
<Midler>
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5_map.asp
01:04
<Midler>
Would you like that to open in a new tab, or blank?
01:04
Midler
would prefer window.open
01:04
<Midler>
so i answered myself ofcourse :P
12:21
takkaria
is now in Sweden
12:36
Philip`
offers condolences
12:37
<takkaria>
:)
12:49
<MikeSmith>
takkaria: you know yet what you'll be working on?
13:03
<Philip`>
gsnedders: http://gsnedders.html5.org/outliner/process.py?url=--%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert('haxxored')%3C/script%3E
13:35
<MikeSmith>
hmm, the spec's not particularly consistent about making it clear whether a particular attribute is required or not
13:36
<MikeSmith>
e.g., for the source element
13:36
<MikeSmith>
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#the-source-element
13:36
<MikeSmith>
the spec doesn't say whether the media element is optional or required
13:37
<MikeSmith>
I guess readers are meant to infer that if the spec doesn't explicitly say a particular attributed is "required" or "must be present", it's optional
13:38
<takkaria>
MikeSmith: I'm on the opera Mini team apparently
13:43
<MikeSmith>
takkaria: really, on Opera Mini team?
13:43
<MikeSmith>
great team
13:43
<MikeSmith>
I reckon you're going to have a chance to do some pretty interesting stuff
13:43
<MikeSmith>
you're going to be coding, right?
13:46
<MikeSmith>
cool to see somebody actually implementing <datagrid>
13:46
<MikeSmith>
hey Rik`
13:47
<Rik`>
hey MikeSmith
13:49
<hsivonen>
whoa! who is implementing datagrid?
13:49
<hsivonen>
with all the copious CSS pseudos within?
13:49
<MikeSmith>
hsivonen: webkit
13:49
<MikeSmith>
dhyatt
13:49
<MikeSmith>
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26545#c1
13:49
<hsivonen>
interesting
13:50
<MikeSmith>
[[
13:50
<MikeSmith>
This implementation may end up being very different from what's in the spec.
13:50
<MikeSmith>
The goal is to create a simpler implementation that can help improve the spec.
13:50
<MikeSmith>
]]
14:01
jgraham
wonders if hsivonen was expecting <datagrid> to be quietly dropped :)
14:07
<hsivonen>
jgraham: I was expecting it to get dropped. not necessarily quietly
20:07
<Philip`>
Hixie: You might want to remove svenāŠ™zc from the WHATWG list, else he'll probably send an "I'm not here" email once a day for the next week
23:51
<Philip`>
gsnedders: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20090621#l-155 in case you missed it earlier