| 00:02 | <Philip`> | ndim: Maybe "spoon-feed the parser characters one at a time"? Anyway it does seem like an error in the spec - it's probably best to email the WHATWG list about it, so Hixie doesn't lose the feedback |
| 00:03 | <Hixie> | i probably meant "spoon-feed the input stream one string at a time" |
| 00:03 | <Hixie> | but yes, please send feedback |
| 00:03 | <Philip`> | Do you mean "one character"? |
| 00:04 | <Philip`> | because otherwise you don't know how long a string is |
| 00:05 | <Hixie> | the point is that document.write() can send input to the parser one string at a time |
| 00:05 | <Philip`> | Oh, right |
| 00:05 | <Hixie> | the phrasing might need work |
| 00:05 | <Philip`> | Maybe the original phrasing does actually make sense, then |
| 00:06 | <ndim> | It is confusing, to say the least. |
| 00:06 | Philip` | agrees |
| 00:06 | <Hixie> | yeah |
| 00:06 | <Hixie> | send mail and i'll fix it |
| 00:06 | <ndim> | ok |
| 00:16 | <jwalden> | Hixie: finally got around to the structure-data threads, nicely done on the solution, looks about as simple as possible but no simpler |
| 00:53 | <Hixie> | jwalden: yay |