00:19
<Philip`>
Hixie: You forgot a comma after adding "Adam Hepton"
00:19
<Hixie>
thanks
00:31
<JonathanNeal>
Phase #1 complete @ http://sandbox.thewikies.com/html5-experiments/phase-01.html woohoo
01:01
<karlcow>
http://gist.github.com/330963
01:01
<karlcow>
Test for browser redirection handling WRT URI fragments, quick and dirty.
01:20
<zcorpan>
Hixie: search for 'hidden' in http://my.opera.com/core/blog/2010/03/03/everything-you-need-to-know-about-html5-video-and-audio-2
03:25
<mpilgrim>
any mac/safari users around?
03:25
<mpilgrim>
i need to test something and i'm not near any macs
03:26
<miketaylr>
im on a mac
03:27
<miketaylr>
w/ safari 4.0.4
03:27
<mpilgrim>
can you install ClickToFlash and test something for me?
03:27
<miketaylr>
sure, one sec
03:27
<mpilgrim>
http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash/
03:29
<miketaylr>
k, installed
03:30
<miketaylr>
mua ha ha http://miketaylr.com/post/b8950f24.png
03:31
<mpilgrim>
ha
03:31
<mpilgrim>
ok, go to http://diveintomark.org/tmp/flashblock-detect.html
03:31
<mpilgrim>
tell me if it says "a Flash blocker was detected"
03:32
<ttepasse>
Here: no flash blocker was detected.
03:32
<miketaylr>
it says: no Flash blocker was detected
03:32
<mpilgrim>
damn it
03:32
<miketaylr>
but, http://miketaylr.com/post/37e864ed.png
03:32
<ttepasse>
(Leopard, Safari 4.x, CtF 1.5.3)
03:32
<miketaylr>
looks blocked to me :p
03:32
<mpilgrim>
yeah
03:34
<mpilgrim>
force-refresh now (shift+refresh button i think)
03:35
<miketaylr>
a Flash blocker was detected
03:35
<miketaylr>
\o/
03:35
<mpilgrim>
aha
03:39
<mpilgrim>
ok, force-refresh again to make sure i didn't just break anything
03:40
<miketaylr>
nope, still good
03:40
<mpilgrim>
ok, final test
03:40
<mpilgrim>
go into the clicktoflash preferences (under your application menu IIRC) and whitelist diveintomark.org
03:41
<mpilgrim>
then force-refresh
03:41
<mpilgrim>
should now say "no flash blocker was detected"
03:41
<mpilgrim>
(after about 5 seconds)
03:42
<miketaylr>
hmmm, still a Flash blocker was detected
03:42
<mpilgrim>
oh damn
03:47
<mpilgrim>
oh bloody hell
03:47
<mpilgrim>
i know what's wrong
03:47
<mpilgrim>
but i don't know how to fix it
03:49
<mpilgrim>
BOY THIS SURE WOULD BE EASIER IF WEBKIT WOULD JUST GO AHEAD AND IMPLEMENT DOMATTRMODIFIED
03:50
<miketaylr>
>:|
03:53
<mpilgrim>
ok, last try
03:53
<mpilgrim>
force-refresh again
03:53
<mpilgrim>
with diveintomark.org still whitelisted
03:55
mpilgrim
throws a sheep at miketaylr
03:56
miketaylr
ducks
03:56
<miketaylr>
whitelisted, no Flash blocker was detected
03:56
<mpilgrim>
that's good
03:56
<mpilgrim>
now clear the whitelist
03:56
<miketaylr>
k
03:56
<mpilgrim>
and refresh
03:57
<miketaylr>
a Flash blocker was detected
03:57
<mpilgrim>
HOORAY
03:57
<miketaylr>
, for great victory
03:57
<mpilgrim>
AFAIK, this is the world's first flashblock detector that works in 3 browsers
03:58
<mpilgrim>
er, world's first PURE JAVASCRIPT flashblock detector
03:58
<miketaylr>
oh, sweet
03:58
<mpilgrim>
thanks for your help
03:58
<miketaylr>
np, sir
04:46
<mpilgrim>
http://code.google.com/p/flashblockdetector/
04:46
<mpilgrim>
going to sleep now
10:00
annevk
reads http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/help-whatwg.org/2010-March/000432.html by coincidence
10:00
annevk
is not subscribed to help⊙wo
10:09
<asmodai>
annevk: funny if you don't monitor it :)
12:13
<hsivonen>
what's the motivating use case behind http://code.google.com/p/flashblockdetector/ ? analytics?
12:16
<Lachy>
I don't know for sure, but one use case might be for advertisers to serve an alternate image instead of flash if they can detect the user won't see the flash.
12:17
<Philip`>
"One good use of this would be to inform users that they need to opt-in to Flash for unobtrusive Flash enhancements (such as invisible audio players) to work on that page."
13:04
<hsivonen>
I thought you were supposed to use <audio> for that in all the browsers that have supported Flash blockers
13:06
<Philip`>
Writing something once in <audio> and once in Flash seems like more work than writing it once in Flash and telling users to turn Flash on
14:47
<boblet>
what’s the difference between rel="license" and <small> if the license info is linked?
14:49
<boblet>
aah, from the example under link type license it seems they’re complementary; wrap rel=license link in small
14:49
<boblet>
thanks :)