| 00:30 | <ajnewbold> | heya gsnedders |
| 08:19 | <hsivonen> | Hixie: you left XForms in the abstract of XBL2 |
| 09:11 | <annevk> | hsivonen, doesn't really matter does it? |
| 09:27 | <hsivonen> | annevk: depends on whether people think that's a use case that has to be supported and start sending in requirements along those lines |
| 09:29 | <annevk> | http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/sep/11/science-stephen-hawking-brian-cox is an interesting read |
| 09:30 | <annevk> | hsivonen, mkay... |
| 12:10 | <karlcow> | http://lint.brihten.com/html/ |
| 12:11 | <karlcow> | >HTML Lint is a tool that makes sure your code looks good. While XHTML was very strict with syntax HTML 5 is more lenient like previous versions of HTML, which means keeping consistent code styles will become more difficult. Validating is not good enough anymore. |
| 12:11 | <karlcow> | --- http://lint.brihten.com/html/help |
| 17:49 | <llrcombs> | I've just noticed a flaw in the registerContentHandler API |
| 17:50 | <llrcombs> | it'd likely choke on files downloaded from servers you have to login to |
| 19:53 | hober | is working on the ISSUE-41 null CP |
| 19:55 | <hober> | I'm trying to find use-cases for DE that can't be met by HTML's existing extension mechanisms. |
| 19:56 | <Philip`> | Isn't that a job for the non-null CPs? |
| 19:57 | <hober> | Oddly, the non-null CPs don't do that |
| 19:57 | <hober> | they describe classes of extensions, but don't provide motivating use-cases for such extension classes |
| 19:57 | <webben> | hober: "existing" - does that exclude microdata and RDFa? |
| 19:58 | <hober> | anyway, I thought there would at least be use-cases not currently addressed that I could at least say "and it's a good thing that HTML doesn't address them" |
| 19:58 | <hober> | webben: it doesn't exclude other WG documents, no |
| 19:59 | <webben> | Hmm. What are the other change proposals asking for then? namespaced elements? |
| 19:59 | <hober> | yup |
| 20:00 | <webben> | hmm... how about something like including musical markup inline in HTML just like SVG and Math? |
| 20:01 | <hober> | is the expectation that browsers implement rendering such markup in some kind of useful way? |
| 20:01 | <hober> | if so, then the people speccing said markup should coordinate with the people working on HTML |
| 20:01 | <webben> | well, I guess in a DE model, browsers that implement that extension would, yeah. |
| 20:02 | <webben> | And, yeah, you can make the counterargument that it would be better for browsermakers etc. to come together and agree a standard. |
| 20:03 | <webben> | But it is a use-case that's not served out of the box - possibly 3d markup and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_Markup_Language would be further examples. |
| 20:04 | <webben> | it's not that hard to think of ways to extend HTML, it's just a question of whether allowing incorporation of arbitrary elements is the way to do that, I guess. |
| 20:23 | <hober> | this is what I have so far: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-41 comments, feedback, etc. very welcome |
| 20:40 | <hsivonen> | webben: those are theoretical until a browser vendor shows interest in implementing one of those vocabs |
| 21:03 | <annevk> | hmm, so now we could switch html5lib to public domain |
| 21:47 | <annevk> | hober, drop "quite" from "quite-complex" :) |
| 21:56 | <hober> | ok |