00:08
<adlwalrus>
is this valid for an iframe? <!doctype html> <img onload="window.parent.postMessage('VIRGIN_VISIT', '*');" src="http://assangedefenseleague.allalla.com/virgin_detect.php"; />
00:10
<weinig>
adlwalrus: valid in what sense?
00:10
<adlwalrus>
weinig: in the html specification one?
00:11
<adlwalrus>
i mean, it wasn't rendering for some reason but i couldn't see anything wrong with it.
00:11
<adlwalrus>
iframes don't need titles
00:11
<adlwalrus>
then it magically started working.
00:11
<adlwalrus>
so i don't have a problem anymore.
00:11
<adlwalrus>
but i'd still be curious.
00:11
<weinig>
it should fine
00:12
<weinig>
that said, it has no visible content, since it seems like the image is just a 5x5 blank image
00:12
<weinig>
the trailing / is also not doing anything good
00:40
<adlwalrus>
weinig: thanks.
03:56
<zewt>
bleh, found a way to skip running css animations, but it only works in webkit
03:56
<zewt>
e.hidden = true; window.getComputedStyle(e).display; e.hidden = false; window.getComputedStyle(e).display;
03:57
<zewt>
no effect in ff or opera
03:57
<zewt>
transitions, rather
04:00
<Hixie>
do they not support .hidden?
04:01
<Hixie>
(why not just set a class that disables the animations?)
04:01
<zewt>
because i want to be able to skip animations and then start another animation immediately
04:02
<zewt>
(firefox definitely supports hidden, heh)
04:45
<zewt>
(in case anyone cares or googles their way to the above rambling, something that works in Firefox: http://pastebin.com/jUYVhC2X; opera equivalent doesn't work, though)
05:05
<Hixie>
anyone support border-image without prefix yet?
05:43
<Hixie>
is there any way to control the alignment of tiled border image pieces?
05:49
<Hixie>
wow, there really isn't?
05:49
<Hixie>
the second ever time i want to use border-image and it doesn't handle my use case :-( :-(
10:22
<matjas>
Hixie: the example on http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html#global-identifiers-for-items uses itemprop="pubdate"; but it seems all schema.org schemas switched to itemprop="datePublished" instead. might make sense to update the example too
10:28
<adlwalrus>
Hi, why is this alt text not displaying? http://jsbin.com/esitef/1/edit
10:36
Velmont
heals after Ms2ger's poke
11:55
<Ms2ger>
Velmont, hey, do you have any more fileapi tests lying around?
12:27
<Velmont>
Ms2ger: Any more as if I had any at all? :P I can check in Opera's repos on monday.
12:46
<Ms2ger>
Velmont, well, zcorpan (I think) submitted a few for new Blob(), but it would be nice to to duplicate work if you have any others
12:53
<Velmont>
Ms2ger: Yea, those. We probably have a few ones scattered about attached to bugs etc, but not always so easy to find. So I guess zcorpan sent the most relevant ones. Anyway, I'll look at it monday :]
15:01
<zewt>
cool, I just froze Opera
15:01
<zewt>
don't think that's ever happened to me before
15:23
<Velmont>
zewt: Hehe, you should do internal QA testing (I was mainline a few months), you'll get your fair share... :D
15:26
<zewt>
i've never worked QA and if I have any say I never will :P
15:26
<zewt>
i believe the phrase is "death for the dead"
15:56
<zewt>
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-align/#overview best diagrams ever
17:06
<Hixie>
matjas: can you file a bug? (click on the example, type your IRC comment into the box at the bottom left, and click the button)
18:22
<hsivonen>
Philip`: how should I report bugs about your font subsetter?
18:22
<hsivonen>
Philip`: see http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/font-subset/wikipedia.html
18:27
<hsivonen>
Philip`: As the full font case shows in Firefox, the font has ligatures for Th, ffi and Qu as well as an alternative glyph for W.
18:28
<hsivonen>
Philip`: When subset.pl is a given that the string "Wikipedia" as the set of characters to include, it properly includes the alternative glyph for W.
18:28
<hsivonen>
Philip`: However, when subset.pl is given the string "The efficient Wikipedia Queen" as the set of characters to include, it's verbose output claims to include (among others) the ligatures T_h, Q_u and f_f_i as well as W.alt. However, none of these actually show up in Firefox.
18:29
<hsivonen>
Philip`: Yet, the resulting font passes Firefox is OpenType validator since the font is used without ligatures and alternative glyphs.
18:35
<adlwalrus>
Hi all, I'm having some trouble interpreting this article: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/02/20/google-bypassing-user-privacy-settings.aspx . What I'm trying to find out is whether a semantically meaningless P3P-CP header will cause IE* to accept or reject third party cookies that are set together with the CP.
18:37
<adlwalrus>
I mean when it comes across a P3PCP that it doesn't understand, will it say "can't understand this, so better safe than sorry / be conservative with user's privacy, so reject the cookie" or "can't make sense of this, but at least a CP was provided, so what the hell? *accept the cookie*"
18:48
<zewt>
(am I the only one that thinks there's something categorically silly about features that say "hey, I know you were planning on violating my privacy in every possible way you think you can profit from, but mind not doing that?")
19:03
<hsivonen>
Philip`: subset.pl generates invalid PostScript Font names. Intentional?
21:23
<MikeSmith>
adlwalrus: I think the only thing newsworthy about that article is the implication that any browser pays any any attention to P3P headers at all