| 02:05 | <JacksoN_5> | hello :) |
| 03:07 | <Yuhong> | More precisely, I think DOM0 refers to what was implemented in Netscape 3 in late 1996. |
| 08:10 | <matjas> | Has the use of <title title="Foo">Bar</title> ever been considered? I have to say I quite like this proposal: http://mathiasbynens.be/notes/touch-icons#comment-76 |
| 08:10 | <matjas> | …to solve the problem of adding bookmarks to the home screen on a mobile device (where you usually need a very short document title) |
| 08:12 | <matjas> | I’m trying to think of things it would break, but failing |
| 08:13 | <matjas> | I mean, `document.title` would still "work" |
| 09:18 | <annevk> | matjas: nobody ever did <th abbr=short>long</th> either |
| 09:23 | <jgraham> | No, but "mobile" is some magic word that makes implementors do whatever you want |
| 09:54 | <Ms2ger> | "allowFullscreen" and "requestFullScreen"? |
| 10:01 | <jgraham> | I see that the blink document falls short of requiring W3C-compatible tests for new features |
| 10:02 | <jgraham> | Although it is an encoruaging step forward from de-facto WebKit policy |
| 10:04 | <jgraham> | I wonder if the plan is to move away from LayoutTests over time |
| 10:12 | <Ms2ger> | Which document? |
| 10:18 | <jgraham> | http://www.chromium.org/blink#testing |
| 11:08 | <annevk> | Ms2ger: now it's requestFullscreen |
| 11:09 | <annevk> | Ms2ger: euh, it's requestFullscreen |
| 11:31 | matjas | diffs those last two messages |
| 11:42 | <Ms2ger> | annevk, tell Hixie_ that? |
| 11:42 | <annevk> | Ms2ger: tell him what? |
| 11:43 | <annevk> | oh |
| 11:43 | <Ms2ger> | HTML has a bunch of references to requestFullScreen, still |
| 11:43 | <Ms2ger> | Four, looks like |
| 11:44 | <annevk> | Ms2ger: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21602 |
| 11:45 | <Ms2ger> | Ta |
| 14:32 | <SteveF> | hixie:re-assigned a few bugs to you as they look like ones that are up your street, hope you don't mind :-) |