00:01
<Hixie>
hey we let _you_ edit
00:01
Hixie
ducks
01:53
<GPHemsley>
Specs todo could probably use a good audit
02:02
<zewt>
add it to the spec todo
02:04
<GPHemsley>
heh
02:05
<boogyman>
haha
07:39
<annevk>
odinho_: can you look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=869874 please
08:41
<dekiss>
good morning all
09:19
<dkiss>
is this complete list of http-equiv attribute posible values? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/ms537417(v=vs.85).aspx
09:28
<dekiss>
which is best way to cntrol how browsers cahce my web page?
11:05
<odinho_>
annevk: Yeah, I took a look at it, but I have not a full debugging setup since I've changed computers since moving to Desktop.
11:07
<odinho>
I will do that when back at work again where I probably should set up a system again.
11:30
<dekiss>
what I don't understand about expire http header is this, someone visit my webpage and current date is after the expires date on my webpage so he gets fresh copy but then he visits again in the next day and he again takes fresh copy? or his browser knows that he has good copy on hdd?
12:29
<annevk>
odinho: cool
15:27
<GPHemsley>
SimonSapin: Were you aware of http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc/datauri/ ? (It's from jreschke.)
15:27
GPHemsley
enjoys talking to people through logs they're unlikely to read.
16:07
<odinho>
GPHemsley: annevk seems to read logs (hi there, man!)
16:18
<GPHemsley>
odinho: Yeah, but he's the only one I know of.
16:18
Ms2ger
raises hand
16:19
<GPHemsley>
good to know
16:21
<GPHemsley>
Help me out with phrasing here: " Once a MIME type has been extracted according to the syntax of its containing protocol, it must be parsed in order to obtain the information it contains. "
16:21
<Ms2ger>
What are you trying to accomplish? :)
16:22
<GPHemsley>
I want to tell anyone implementing the "parse a MIME type" algorithm that they're to handle any protocol-specific stuff (like URL encoding, or multi-line unescaping) before they run the algorithm, and that the only way to extract information from a MIME type is by running this algorithm
16:25
<Ms2ger>
Mm
16:26
<Ms2ger>
I'd think the first part should be obvious from the layering
16:27
<GPHemsley>
you'd think, but you wouldn't always be right ;)
16:37
<odinho>
I'm always on, and I frequently read backlog.
16:37
<odinho>
That's the same as log reading, only without the irritating log reading.
16:38
<dekiss>
guys did I talked to real Hixie yesterday?
16:39
<tantek>
dekiss, identity on IRC, it is a challenge isn't it?
16:40
<dekiss>
yep :)
16:40
<dekiss>
he said he is he was admin here but never replied to my mail i sent him test email and asked for him to reply as I see he is really him :)
16:41
<tantek>
he gets a lot of email :)
16:56
<GPHemsley>
odinho: Indeed.
16:56
<GPHemsley>
dekiss: If we tell you no, will you stop asking?
17:01
<GPHemsley>
Ms2ger: No tips?
17:02
<Ms2ger>
Can't come up with anything, I'm afraid
17:03
<dekiss>
GPHemsley im not sure
17:04
<Ms2ger>
dekiss, and yes, Hixie is Hixie
17:08
<dekiss>
have you edited some html css content or something else
18:49
<zcorpan>
GPHemsley: for parameters, you can test parsing in other headers than content-type. For instance, Link: <foo.css>; type=stylesheet; title=etc
18:49
<zcorpan>
GPHemsley: or Content-Disposition: download; filename="..."
18:51
<zcorpan>
er, attachment
18:51
<zcorpan>
Refresh: ...
18:51
<zcorpan>
Set-Cookie:
19:02
<Ms2ger>
Set-Cookie2
19:02
Ms2ger
ducks
19:08
<GPHemsley>
zcorpan: I was wondering about that... are all HTTP headers parsed the same? Because this algorithm assumes it only applies specifically to MIME types.
19:12
<zcorpan>
GPHemsley: i don't know, but it might be worth looking into
19:12
<GPHemsley>
perhaps
19:12
<zcorpan>
it would make sense to parse them the same
19:13
<GPHemsley>
in some ways yes and in some ways no
19:13
<GPHemsley>
MIME types are (now) defined independent of HTTP
19:13
<GPHemsley>
and I don't know the extent of coordination between the two
19:13
<GPHemsley>
(since HTTP 1.1 was defined)
19:16
<zcorpan>
i'm more interested in whether current implementations use the same parser for all headers
19:26
<GPHemsley>
I don't think they do
19:26
<GPHemsley>
but that's just my anecdotal impression
19:27
<GPHemsley>
(since I know I've look at MIME type-specific code)
19:27
<GPHemsley>
+ed
19:37
GPHemsley
wonders why IETF has so often chosen to abbreviate "parameter" as "parm" instead of "param"...
19:37
<GPHemsley>
it makes me hungry...
19:42
<GPHemsley>
Ms2ger: Is there a way to make anolis use a different timezone than UTC?
19:44
<Ms2ger>
GPHemsley, not at this point; patches welcome
19:44
<GPHemsley>
Where in the code might that go?
19:44
<Ms2ger>
anolislib/processes/sub.py
19:45
<Ms2ger>
Where it says time.gmtime() now :)
19:59
<dekiss>
should I wrap my website in article element?
19:59
<dekiss>
if I want to make in the left side logo and in right some picture or s;lideshow should I put invisible header element?
20:01
<dekiss>
in which element should I wrap my website?
20:02
<Ms2ger>
body
20:02
<dekiss>
:)
20:02
<dekiss>
other,
20:02
<dekiss>
so I can put my website in middle of screen
20:02
<dekiss>
div? or
20:04
<dekiss>
I cant put body in the middle, that way I must put every element in the middle separately
20:04
<dekiss>
and I will not have control over webwite
20:13
<GPHemsley>
Ms2ger: Not the best code, but there you go.
20:16
<dekiss>
why when I put h1 and h2 heading in hgroup element they are boh same size?
21:00
<GPHemsley>
Hixie: What was the difficulty in defining a "resource" again?
21:11
<dekiss>
should I give ids and classes to html5 semantic section element like header nav section article?
22:08
GPHemsley
grumbles something about bug reporters who don't accept bugmail
22:39
<dekiss>
is it ok to put articles in sections?