08:35
<annevk>
git submodule update --init --recursive <3
08:35
annevk
finally remembers where to find that line
09:57
<zcorpan>
MikeSmith: it appears an IE conditional comment before the doctype does not cause quirks mode. I wonder if the warning is at all helpful anymore
10:06
<zcorpan>
MikeSmith: https://github.com/validator/htmlparser/pull/2
10:33
<zcorpan>
was there a deliberate reason "con" wasn't chosen over "const" in JS? or was that never on the table?
10:36
<annevk>
zcorpan: wasn't that just taken from C?
10:37
<zcorpan>
i don't know the history of JS's const :-)
10:37
zcorpan
finds PBASIC has a "CON" keyword for constants
10:40
<hasather>
zcorpan: I think they chose it because several engines had already implemented "const" for years
10:41
<zcorpan>
hasather: ok
10:42
<hasather>
zcorpan: https://twitter.com/awbjs/status/699285374737121281
10:45
<zcorpan>
thanks
11:02
<smaug____>
how do I follow some github issue?
11:02
<AutomatedTester>
smaug____: on the right there is a subscribe button
11:02
<smaug____>
aha, thanks
11:08
<jgraham>
con is a really unfortunate name though :)_
11:44
<nox>
zcorpan: "con" is like Rust's "ret" in the beginning: a bad idea. :P
11:54
<zcorpan>
make it "pro" :-)
12:38
<zcorpan>
83769: <em>can</em> at least be retrofitted for offline use using the <span
12:38
<zcorpan>
is that "retrofit" in en-US? annevk
12:38
<zcorpan>
https://localize.drupal.org/node/420
12:39
<zcorpan>
tick mark -> check mark also
12:40
<annevk>
zcorpan: hmm dunno
12:41
<zcorpan>
(though the spec's "tick mark"s are not check marks)
13:01
<annevk>
compareDocumentPosition() 😟
16:45
<Riddhik11>
Hi
16:46
<Riddhik11>
I am looking for help to start contributing at https://github.com/whatwg/html project
17:30
<Domenic>
Riddhik11: hi, awesome! How can we help?
17:31
<Domenic>
Riddhik11: did you see https://github.com/whatwg/html/labels/good%20first%20bug ? I think https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/1582 is an especially good one.
23:10
<TabAtkins>
zcorpan, annevk: Per my english, "retrofit" is a standard verb, and conjugates to "retrofitted" in that circumstance.
23:42
<GPHemsley>
TabAtkins: Do you know offhand how many Syntax-compliant CSS parsers there are?
23:44
<GPHemsley>
SimonSapin: Same question to you ^
23:45
<SimonSapin>
GPHemsley: a few are listed at https://github.com/SimonSapin/css-parsing-tests#projects-using-this
23:45
<SimonSapin>
I think TabAtkins has written one in JS
23:45
<GPHemsley>
cool, thanks for already having curated a list :)
23:45
<TabAtkins>
https://github.com/tabatkins/parse-css
23:46
<SimonSapin>
GPHemsley: I have no idea if this is exhaustive of course
23:46
<SimonSapin>
I can’t answer "how many" since it’s quite possible someone has written one and not told me about it
23:47
<GPHemsley>
sure
23:47
<GPHemsley>
that was just the best way I could come up with to phrase the question
23:47
<GPHemsley>
I've gotten the answers I was looking for :)
23:47
<SimonSapin>
:)
23:49
<smaug____>
anyone with webkit?
23:49
<smaug____>
well, Safari I guess
23:51
<smaug____>
what does data:text/html,<script>document.write("onafterprint" in window)</script> say there?